User contributions for Korruski
A user with 2,270 edits. Account created on 22 July 2010.
3 December 2018
- 08:1608:16, 3 December 2018 diff hist +748 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Galobtter →Oppose: Add comment Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
2 December 2018
- 15:4315:43, 2 December 2018 diff hist +276 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Galobtter →Neutral: Strike Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:3815:38, 2 December 2018 diff hist +885 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Galobtter →Oppose: Oppose Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
30 November 2018
- 12:3512:35, 30 November 2018 diff hist +666 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Galobtter →Neutral: Neutral
10 November 2018
- 01:3201:32, 10 November 2018 diff hist +13 Lever action Who defines what is correct terminology? Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
22 October 2018
- 14:1314:13, 22 October 2018 diff hist −106 Hutton Inquiry →The inquiry: Grossly inaccurate. The coroner’s inquest was adjourned - this is one of the controversies surrounding the case so to suggest otherwise is just wrong. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
3 October 2018
- 12:3812:38, 3 October 2018 diff hist −186 Challenge coin →Britain: Not cited and not notable - everyone has one.
26 September 2018
- 07:3907:39, 26 September 2018 diff hist −59 LBi →History: Obviously not notable
18 September 2018
- 08:1508:15, 18 September 2018 diff hist +1,602 Wikipedia talk:RFA by month →Colour Scheme: First pass
14 September 2018
- 08:1308:13, 14 September 2018 diff hist +17 Wikipedia talk:RFA by month →Colour Scheme: Oh I worked it out, but not sure how to set about editing this.
- 08:0908:09, 14 September 2018 diff hist +658 Wikipedia talk:RFA by month →Colour Scheme: Reply
13 September 2018
- 14:1414:14, 13 September 2018 diff hist +703 Wikipedia talk:RFA by month →Colour Scheme: new section
23 August 2018
- 12:1512:15, 23 August 2018 diff hist +850 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Philafrenzy →Oppose: +1 oppose
- 12:0712:07, 23 August 2018 diff hist +661 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Philafrenzy →Oppose: Reply
- 07:5207:52, 23 August 2018 diff hist +918 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Philafrenzy →Oppose: Comment re rollback
1 August 2018
- 22:3022:30, 1 August 2018 diff hist +540 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jbhunley →Oppose: +1 oppose
12 June 2018
- 11:3511:35, 12 June 2018 diff hist +1,100 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TheSandDoctor →Support: Comment on 'brilliantly matching consensus'
11 June 2018
- 19:4219:42, 11 June 2018 diff hist +583 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TheSandDoctor →Oppose: +1 op Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
16 May 2017
- 06:5206:52, 16 May 2017 diff hist +920 Talk:Greg Mortenson →Undue weight in Lede: new section
- 06:4606:46, 16 May 2017 diff hist 0 Greg Mortenson Undid revision 780591931 by Kintetsubuffalo (talk) Explain your issue on the talk page - giving a vague wave in the direction of a policy means nothing.
15 May 2017
- 22:4022:40, 15 May 2017 diff hist 0 Greg Mortenson Undid revision 768754226 by Kintetsubuffalo (talk) Disagree. The criticism is far too significant to be wholesale copy/pasted out of the lede with a two-word justification.
30 April 2017
- 15:5415:54, 30 April 2017 diff hist −66 Police ranks of the United States This is *nothing* like the Met Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
23 January 2017
- 12:2712:27, 23 January 2017 diff hist +1 m Royal Military Police →The RMP in popular culture: Oops
- 12:2712:27, 23 January 2017 diff hist +391 Royal Military Police →The RMP in popular culture: Adding recent tv series which features them heavily.
19 January 2017
- 22:5622:56, 19 January 2017 diff hist −91 Ian Bruce (painter) →The Correspondents: Deleting absolute hilarity
17 January 2017
- 15:5215:52, 17 January 2017 diff hist +130 Order of Saint Joachim Replacing content removed as a 'spurious source', which is nonsensical. This was not a 'source', spurious or otherwise, but a relevant expert statement as to the legitimacy or otherwise of the body. Taking this key information out of the lede is bizzarre.
- 15:4515:45, 17 January 2017 diff hist −11 Order of Saint Joachim →Status and legitimacy: of course he considers it personally - is there any other way to consider something. But adding this word seeks to undermine his expertise and status to comment on this subject.
- 15:4315:43, 17 January 2017 diff hist +1 Order of Saint Joachim This is confusing alongside the second sentence unless we are clear about tenses.
16 January 2017
- 08:3808:38, 16 January 2017 diff hist −1 The Colbert Report →Themes: No one is really disinterested in modern politics Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
25 November 2016
- 15:5515:55, 25 November 2016 diff hist +816 Order of Saint Joachim Replaced lede that was wholesale removed for very strange reasons. A) the lede is supposed to summarise much of the rest of the article and b) if you think there is too much duplication, fix it, don't just delete the whole thing.
21 November 2016
- 13:1013:10, 21 November 2016 diff hist +8 253 Provost Company →4 Regiment RMP: update
- 13:0913:09, 21 November 2016 diff hist −16 253 Provost Company →top: No longer uses volunteers title
11 August 2016
- 07:4407:44, 11 August 2016 diff hist +34 User:Korruski →Pages I've created or significantly expanded: One more
- 07:4207:42, 11 August 2016 diff hist +17 Diving into the Unknown Turnin' red links blueee
- 07:4107:41, 11 August 2016 diff hist −23 Diving into the Unknown Fix a couple of minor wibbles
- 07:4007:40, 11 August 2016 diff hist +3,161 N Diving into the Unknown Initial creation. Lots still to do
10 August 2016
- 12:2812:28, 10 August 2016 diff hist +2 Order of Saint Joachim →Status and legitimacy: Separate issues
- 12:2812:28, 10 August 2016 diff hist +1 Order of Saint Joachim →Status and legitimacy: did not and does not
- 12:2712:27, 10 August 2016 diff hist −200 Order of Saint Joachim No citation since 2008
8 August 2016
- 10:1410:14, 8 August 2016 diff hist +5 Order of Saint Joachim →Status and legitimacy: saying he 'credits' it adds a POV. He describes it as a charitable institution - that is sufficient. Also note that appearing in Debretts is not 'recognition', merely observation of use.
- 10:1210:12, 8 August 2016 diff hist +16 Order of Saint Joachim →20th and 21st centuries: Clarification that this is the present situation. May have been different in C18/C19
- 10:1210:12, 8 August 2016 diff hist +637 Order of Saint Joachim →20th and 21st centuries: More info on status of medals etc
7 August 2016
- 17:2317:23, 7 August 2016 diff hist +246 Dive computer Source for display info
4 August 2016
- 12:5612:56, 4 August 2016 diff hist −108 Order of Saint Joachim No source for any reliable historian who thinks it anything but self-styled.
3 August 2016
- 05:1905:19, 3 August 2016 diff hist −34 Greg Mortenson →top: Humanitarian is a bit abstract, especially given the allegations against him. Are there sources that specifically use the word?
2 August 2016
- 18:0918:09, 2 August 2016 diff hist +238 Order of Saint Joachim Extra info about modern activities Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:5811:58, 2 August 2016 diff hist −113 Order of Saint Joachim →20th and 21st centuries: irrelevant and uncited
- 11:5711:57, 2 August 2016 diff hist −6 Order of Saint Joachim →20th and 21st centuries: 11 years ago isn
- 11:2211:22, 2 August 2016 diff hist −574 Order of Saint Joachim →20th and 21st centuries: Better organization of info, and removing one of the frankly excessive mentions of Nelson, which have very little to do with the order itself.
- 11:1511:15, 2 August 2016 diff hist +364 Order of Saint Joachim →20th and 21st centuries: Source for 'revived' rather than recreated.
