User contributions for Jonathystiensteinstone
A user with 6 edits. Account created on 5 June 2024.
6 June 2024
- 00:5800:58, 6 June 2024 diff hist +164 Pepé Le Pew The paragraph is fine and doesn't need to be overly long or detailed. That is what the critism section is for. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 June 2024
- 22:3722:37, 5 June 2024 diff hist +95 Pepé Le Pew If it must be there it should be worded as such, giving more of an unbiased tone and being plain and simple regarding the situation and unknown nature of what will happen with the character. Hopefully this will be a nice compromise. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 18:0118:01, 5 June 2024 diff hist +1,263 User talk:Notwally →Editing Issues with Pepé Le Pew Page: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
- 17:4417:44, 5 June 2024 diff hist +395 User talk:Jonathystiensteinstone →June 2024: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 17:4217:42, 5 June 2024 diff hist −319 Pepé Le Pew This is my only account, I just made it last night. I did edit twice without an account prior to making the last change. In addition, it still stands that if you wish to add notable content revolving around the controversy around the character, you should do it in the proper section and be unbiased. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 17:3717:37, 5 June 2024 diff hist −285 Pepé Le Pew Please stop making unnecessary additions to the page. There is already a section for critism for the character. In addition, the section edited comes across as biased in the wording. If you have anything you'd like to add with the character do it in the critism section and be objective on the topic. Thank you. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
