User contributions for Johnnysmitha
Appearance
A user with 20 edits. Account created on 8 September 2017.
9 September 2017
- 20:4320:43, 9 September 2017 diff hist −179 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seeta Kulkarni →Seeta Kulkarni
- 20:4120:41, 9 September 2017 diff hist +325 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seeta Kulkarni →Seeta Kulkarni
- 20:0620:06, 9 September 2017 diff hist +12 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Reed →Roger Reed
- 20:0320:03, 9 September 2017 diff hist +158 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Reed →Roger Reed
- 20:0020:00, 9 September 2017 diff hist +486 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Reed →Roger Reed
- 19:3619:36, 9 September 2017 diff hist −2,151 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Reed →Roger Reed
- 19:2919:29, 9 September 2017 diff hist +991 User talk:Adziman No edit summary current
- 19:2819:28, 9 September 2017 diff hist +101 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 9 No edit summary
- 19:1719:17, 9 September 2017 diff hist +3,661 N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Reed Creating deletion discussion for Roger Reed
- 18:5318:53, 9 September 2017 diff hist +413 Roger Reed AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Reed
- 18:4718:47, 9 September 2017 diff hist 0 Talk:Roger Reed No edit summary
- 18:4718:47, 9 September 2017 diff hist +30 m Talk:Roger Reed No edit summary
- 18:4418:44, 9 September 2017 diff hist +5 m Talk:Roger Reed No edit summary
- 18:4318:43, 9 September 2017 diff hist +2,212 Talk:Roger Reed No edit summary
- 18:1018:10, 9 September 2017 diff hist +267 User talk:Johnnysmitha →Deprodding of Roger Reed
8 September 2017
- 21:1021:10, 8 September 2017 diff hist +1,322 User talk:Adziman No edit summary
- 21:0321:03, 8 September 2017 diff hist +124 Roger Reed No edit summary
- 20:2920:29, 8 September 2017 diff hist +114 Talk:Roger Reed No edit summary
- 20:2620:26, 8 September 2017 diff hist +866 Talk:Roger Reed Deletion request
- 19:5919:59, 8 September 2017 diff hist +110 Roger Reed Delete. An average Oxford professor. No secondary sources. Looks like a vanity project.