User contributions for IIXVXII
A user with 134 edits. Account created on 10 July 2012.
28 May 2024
- 21:2221:22, 28 May 2024 diff hist +929 User talk:Alexanderkowal No edit summary
- 20:4220:42, 28 May 2024 diff hist −1,237 Agnosticism The second sentence in the lede for agnosticism is an advertisement for apatheism? No, WP:Advocacy, let alone that the sources quoted don't use the words apathy or apatheism. Tag: Reverted
21 March 2024
- 08:4108:41, 21 March 2024 diff hist −12 m Agnosticism My last two edits were of the 1 sentence that was turned into 2 sentences. I combined them back into 1 sentence.
- 08:2508:25, 21 March 2024 diff hist −113 m Agnosticism What agnostic means to atheists versus agnostics is contentious. It is WP:Advocacy to pretend this is not true and make a definite statement in the agnostic page that the atheist perspective is the correct one.
- 08:1908:19, 21 March 2024 diff hist −16 m Agnosticism Changing Harrison back to Smith. It is not good mechanics to switch the subject person mid sentence. Nor does the word "promote" imply "coined."
29 November 2023
- 04:0904:09, 29 November 2023 diff hist −524 Agnosticism There are now 4 quotes from Huxley in Defining Agnosticism. We certainly do not need to be repeating these quotes in the lede. "General definition" is original research. I'm also removing the biased standard that some quotes require the question Huxley was asked, while others do not. Reverting back to a previous lede. At least discuss in the Talk page when changing the lede.
28 September 2023
- 23:3623:36, 28 September 2023 diff hist +11 Agnosticism Added back old quote seemingly removed for WP:ADVOCACY while keeping the new one. The statement by Huxley I changed was a combination of two answers from two questions. I removed the first two sentences as one contributes little and the other is stated in the lede. Now this statement is one answer from one question.
21 September 2023
- 21:2121:21, 21 September 2023 diff hist −149 Agnosticism Bertrand Russell states agnosticism is not atheism. Whether it is or not is a subjective matter and should not be stated in the lede for agnosticism as fact.
30 December 2021
- 01:4201:42, 30 December 2021 diff hist +1,198 Agnosticism WP:ADVOCACY Agnostics and Atheists disagree on definitions. Let us have that discussion in the talk page instead of just changing the lede.
31 March 2021
- 02:2502:25, 31 March 2021 diff hist +289 Talk:Agnosticism/GA2 →Why metaphysical personocracy (metaphysical personocracy: to deem [explicitly] personhood [god is the cosmogonic person], or [implicitly] the projected purpose people ascribe and project unto the universe, its content and to all hypotherical cosmoi) is one out of an infinite list of alternative biases; but humans value personocracy more because they themselves are persons.
- 02:2402:24, 31 March 2021 diff hist −289 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
- 02:2102:21, 31 March 2021 diff hist +297 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
2 January 2021
- 20:2220:22, 2 January 2021 diff hist +702 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
7 December 2020
- 01:1701:17, 7 December 2020 diff hist +736 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
26 September 2020
22 June 2020
- 14:5214:52, 22 June 2020 diff hist −650 Agnosticism No original research
24 February 2019
- 20:5020:50, 24 February 2019 diff hist +627 User talk:Moxy →Agnosticism - Bernard Iddings Bell: new section
7 February 2019
- 23:2823:28, 7 February 2019 diff hist +42 Agnosticism No edit summary
- 17:5317:53, 7 February 2019 diff hist −1 Agnosticism Undid revision 881131332 by Xeissan (talk)Unknown is weak agnosticism. Unknowable is strong agnosticism. The correct conjunction is OR. See Qualifying Agnosticism. Tag: Undo
28 February 2018
- 17:4117:41, 28 February 2018 diff hist +69 Agnosticism The logical disjunction cited contains multiple propositions and they should all be listed instead of cherry picked.
3 February 2018
- 01:5701:57, 3 February 2018 diff hist +1,258 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
26 January 2018
- 03:3403:34, 26 January 2018 diff hist +426 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
17 January 2018
- 07:1007:10, 17 January 2018 diff hist +1,621 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
16 January 2018
- 08:4508:45, 16 January 2018 diff hist −1,904 User talk:IIXVXII ←Blanked the page current Tag: Blanking
- 08:4008:40, 16 January 2018 diff hist +397 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
15 January 2018
- 03:3403:34, 15 January 2018 diff hist +1,973 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
12 January 2018
- 01:3101:31, 12 January 2018 diff hist +155 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
- 01:2901:29, 12 January 2018 diff hist −4 User:IIXVXII No edit summary current
- 01:2801:28, 12 January 2018 diff hist +191 User:IIXVXII No edit summary
11 January 2018
- 21:1921:19, 11 January 2018 diff hist +2,438 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
3 January 2018
- 15:0415:04, 3 January 2018 diff hist +8 Agnosticism No edit summary
- 15:0015:00, 3 January 2018 diff hist +3,655 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
30 December 2017
- 06:3906:39, 30 December 2017 diff hist +19 Agnosticism No edit summary
- 06:3706:37, 30 December 2017 diff hist +2,442 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
27 December 2017
- 04:2604:26, 27 December 2017 diff hist +2,804 Talk:Agnosticism No edit summary
26 December 2017
- 13:5813:58, 26 December 2017 diff hist −91 Agnosticism Undid revision 817129334 by Flawliss (talk) "making it compatible with forming a belief" implies it currently is not, which is false. Please see WP:ADVOCACY and start a talk discussion.
- 08:1008:10, 26 December 2017 diff hist +28 User:IIXVXII No edit summary
- 08:0808:08, 26 December 2017 diff hist +90 User:IIXVXII No edit summary
- 07:3907:39, 26 December 2017 diff hist −20 Agnosticism Undid revision 813767606 by Kevin Dewitt (talk) This article is not related to atheism. Even the atheism portal says "Atheism is also generally contrasted with agnosticism.."
- 07:3207:32, 26 December 2017 diff hist −91 Agnosticism Undid revision 816742256 by Flawliss (talk) Agnosticism is a belief. My edit has stood for months. The burden is upon you to argue for the change. I suggest you discuss this in the talk page
22 December 2017
- 02:1902:19, 22 December 2017 diff hist −91 Agnosticism Undid revision 814876331 by Flawliss (talk) The majority of this article is about what Agnostics believe. Agnosticism is not some axiom, theorem or corollary of logic. View and belief are synonyms.
8 December 2017
- 10:1110:11, 8 December 2017 diff hist −91 Agnosticism Undid revision 813612278 by Flawliss (talk) Agnosticism is not incompatible with forming a belief, see reference [3]. The 'effect of the change' is original research.
25 November 2017
- 05:3705:37, 25 November 2017 diff hist −12 User talk:IIXVXII ←Blanked the page
- 05:3605:36, 25 November 2017 diff hist +12 N User:IIXVXII ←Created page with '{{Agnostic}}'
- 05:2805:28, 25 November 2017 diff hist −91 Agnosticism Undid revision 806744629 by Flawliss (talk) Original research. There is no citation given and the closet one from George Smith does make such a claim.
23 May 2017
- 03:2403:24, 23 May 2017 diff hist −91 Agnosticism Deleted original research.
- 03:2103:21, 23 May 2017 diff hist −1 Agnosticism OR is the correct connective as evident by the definitions of weak and strong agnosticism.
13 September 2016
- 02:0702:07, 13 September 2016 diff hist −108 Agnosticism Undid revision 738650581 by ViggoTW (talk) Not to be confused with Gnosticism. Agnosticism and Gnosticism are very different, well beyond the ancient Greek meanings of the root words.
5 April 2016
- 19:0819:08, 5 April 2016 diff hist −30 Agnosticism →Atheistic: Atheistic criticisms have nothing to do with agnostic atheism. Stop with the advocacy.
- 19:0819:08, 5 April 2016 diff hist −29 Agnosticism →Theistic: Theistic criticism has nothing to do with agnostic theism. Stop with the advocacy.
