User contributions for Hendrik Biebouw
A user with 225 edits. Account created on 12 February 2013.
24 January 2014
- 01:3201:32, 24 January 2014 diff hist −17 Boers Corrected the link.
- 01:3101:31, 24 January 2014 diff hist +91 Boers Distinguishing the two nation which under stereotype are perceived to be one. Tag: Visual edit
16 January 2014
- 10:2710:27, 16 January 2014 diff hist −9 Rustenburg Setswana where the first colonial residents. However, I've removed the phrase "colonial" in consideration of Bantu colonialism. Tag: Visual edit
- 10:2410:24, 16 January 2014 diff hist +60 Rustenburg Inserting a non-bias opening syntax. Selective colonial language is not allowed. Tag: Visual edit
15 January 2014
- 06:5706:57, 15 January 2014 diff hist −6 South Africa /* Languages /* What other European language in contrast? Afrikaans is African and English is European, however, it is the Business lingo. No point-of-view allowed. My source? The South African government I say triumphantly. Tag: Visual edit
- 06:4706:47, 15 January 2014 diff hist +1,057 Talk:San people →Requested move 12 January 2014
14 January 2014
- 11:4711:47, 14 January 2014 diff hist +11 Separatism Corrected the Afriaker-Boere link to the appropriate page instead of the Boer ethnic page.
- 11:1611:16, 14 January 2014 diff hist +95 White people in Botswana Added a link and more detailed adjectives to bring a balance tone to his mere article covering White pigmented Africans.
- 11:0411:04, 14 January 2014 diff hist +2 User talk:Hendrik Biebouw →Welcome
- 11:0111:01, 14 January 2014 diff hist +552 Talk:San people →Survey
5 January 2014
- 06:4306:43, 5 January 2014 diff hist +74 Boers POV
3 January 2014
- 05:3905:39, 3 January 2014 diff hist −2 Swazi people Colonial language is used with African nation Afrikaner unapologetically, however, not with Black pigmented African nations. I will oppose this and shall therefore provide the same tone to their pages respectively. Tag: Visual edit
29 December 2013
- 13:3313:33, 29 December 2013 diff hist +19 Afrikaners If we are going to stipulate where this nation are derived from ethnically, then, why not include that they also descend from the Khoi, ecterta? Tag: Visual edit
26 December 2013
- 03:1503:15, 26 December 2013 diff hist +275 Talk:South Africa →POV by asserting Afrikaners and Boers as European
- 03:1003:10, 26 December 2013 diff hist −2 m South Africa Extra space in which I corrected it. Tag: Visual edit
- 03:0803:08, 26 December 2013 diff hist +4 South Africa Those who hate that Afrikaners brought South Africa's independence clearly have polluted the editors of this page (or two). In all African states, the term 'Independence' is used. Why not South Africa you ask? Tag: Visual edit
- 03:0503:05, 26 December 2013 diff hist +5 South Africa No POV allowed. It is a form of colonialism like it or not. Ask a Khoi, San, they will tell you. Ask staunch supporters of Apartheid they will say no. Ask todays order, they would say no. This Apartheid, liberal, Luthuli House POV is irksome. Stop it. Tag: Visual edit
18 December 2013
- 09:4809:48, 18 December 2013 diff hist +67 User:Hendrik Biebouw No edit summary current
- 09:4609:46, 18 December 2013 diff hist +1 Talk:Rhodesia →POV on "indigenous" Africans
- 09:4609:46, 18 December 2013 diff hist +1 Talk:Rhodesia →POV on "indigenous" Africans
- 09:4309:43, 18 December 2013 diff hist +139 Talk:Rhodesia →POV on "indigenous" Africans
17 December 2013
- 11:3411:34, 17 December 2013 diff hist −11 Rhodesia I'll leave it African, which supports your notion that the 'majority' of Rhodesian are from colonial origin. However, I refuse to accede to this ahistorical notion that the Bantu are indigenous to Southern Africa. Tag: Visual edit
- 07:4707:47, 17 December 2013 diff hist +2 Talk:Rhodesia →POV on "indigenous" Africans
- 07:4407:44, 17 December 2013 diff hist −183 Talk:Rhodesia →POV on "indigenous" Africans
- 07:4107:41, 17 December 2013 diff hist +110 Talk:Rhodesia →POV on "indigenous" Africans
- 07:4107:41, 17 December 2013 diff hist +2,451 Talk:Rhodesia →POV on "indigenous" Africans
16 December 2013
- 03:4503:45, 16 December 2013 diff hist +1,522 Talk:Rhodesia →POV on "indigenous" Africans
15 December 2013
- 07:2907:29, 15 December 2013 diff hist −19 Rhodesia Your side comment is irrelevant to less pigmented Africans. Furthermore it is ahistorical to label those of Eastern African decedent as indigenous within the Southern Africa region. And Afrikaners are African if they are born in South Africa or not. POV!
14 December 2013
- 11:3811:38, 14 December 2013 diff hist −19 Rhodesia Wannabe be native POV again. Bantu is NOT indigenous to Southern Africa, hence Zimbabwe. POV of this kind shall be corrected. Tag: Visual edit
5 December 2013
- 09:2709:27, 5 December 2013 diff hist −2 Francistown Colonisation unapologetically. These editors with a POV of Bantu colonial denial syndrome through covering it up with manipulative language needs to go. Tag: Visual edit
1 December 2013
- 13:3813:38, 1 December 2013 diff hist +17 Afrikaners The right to sovereignty for Afrikaners added. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:3213:32, 1 December 2013 diff hist −467 Afrikaners Sorry. Another time (or era.) I agree with this, however, yours (and mine) point of view is irrelevant and tiny in retro - perspective. If you can, now if, find credible sources to cite and support this ambitious section then please, bring it forward. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:1713:17, 1 December 2013 diff hist +6 Afrikaners →Black Afrikaners Tag: Visual edit
- 13:1613:16, 1 December 2013 diff hist +19 Afrikaners Included some links. Though, the original author of this piece didn't cite any credible sources. Thus, I fear it will be taken down. I just didn't want to as I think it holds some legitimacy in asserting a balance view of the Afrikaner ethnically. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:0913:09, 1 December 2013 diff hist +442 Afrikaners Northing wrong. Very informative and represents a new era of an Afrikanerism. However, we need to cite a source or two.
28 November 2013
- 03:1903:19, 28 November 2013 diff hist −39 South Africa Undid revision 583616470 by Hendrik Biebouw (talk)
- 03:1803:18, 28 November 2013 diff hist −3 South Africa Undid revision 583616598 by Hendrik Biebouw (talk)
- 03:1603:16, 28 November 2013 diff hist +3 South Africa Corrected a heading mistake
- 03:1503:15, 28 November 2013 diff hist +39 South Africa Colonialism with a reference.
26 November 2013
- 07:4507:45, 26 November 2013 diff hist −154 Talk:South Africa →POV by asserting Afrikaners and Boers as European
- 05:1605:16, 26 November 2013 diff hist +19 Afrikaners No legitimate reason. Pro strictly White nation orientated POV?
25 November 2013
- 12:4712:47, 25 November 2013 diff hist +20 Afrikaners Added a more constructive geographical meaning to the opening sentence. Thus a language, like Swahili that is developed in Africa. Tag: Visual edit
- 12:4412:44, 25 November 2013 diff hist +67 List of active separatist movements in Africa Added the UN organ Afrikaners/Boers are part of.
- 07:4207:42, 25 November 2013 diff hist −2 Talk:South Africa →POV by assering Afrikaners and Boers as European
- 07:3707:37, 25 November 2013 diff hist +13 Talk:South Africa →POV by assering Afrikaners and Boers as European
- 06:0606:06, 25 November 2013 diff hist +105 Talk:South Africa →POV by assering Afrikaners and Boers as European
- 06:0206:02, 25 November 2013 diff hist +5 Talk:South Africa →POV by assering Afrikaners and Boers as European
- 05:5905:59, 25 November 2013 diff hist +261 Talk:South Africa →POV by assering Afrikaners and Boers as European
- 05:4905:49, 25 November 2013 diff hist +1,806 Talk:South Africa This collective of the same POV must stop.
23 November 2013
- 03:0203:02, 23 November 2013 diff hist +46 Northern Cape Corrected the link.
