User contributions for ForestTeacher
A user with 66 edits. Account created on 28 January 2012.
10 February 2012
- 19:4719:47, 10 February 2012 diff hist +759 Talk:Shramana →Recent edit warring
- 19:0119:01, 10 February 2012 diff hist +462 Talk:Shramana →Recent edit warring
- 07:4507:45, 10 February 2012 diff hist −5,613 User talk:ForestTeacher No edit summary
- 07:3607:36, 10 February 2012 diff hist +529 User talk:Mayasutra →Reply to ForestTeacher
- 07:3407:34, 10 February 2012 diff hist +529 User talk:ForestTeacher →Reply to ForestTeacher
- 07:2707:27, 10 February 2012 diff hist +2,934 User talk:ForestTeacher →Reply to ForestTeacher
- 07:2707:27, 10 February 2012 diff hist +8 User talk:Mayasutra →Reply to ForestTeacher
- 07:2607:26, 10 February 2012 diff hist +99 User talk:Mayasutra →Reply to ForestTeacher
- 07:2507:25, 10 February 2012 diff hist +2,827 User talk:Mayasutra →Reply to ForestTeacher
- 06:0506:05, 10 February 2012 diff hist −6,676 User talk:ForestTeacher ←Blanked the page
- 06:0306:03, 10 February 2012 diff hist +867 User talk:Mayasutra →Reply to ForestTeacher
- 05:2805:28, 10 February 2012 diff hist +372 User talk:Mayasutra →WRT shramana
- 05:2305:23, 10 February 2012 diff hist −20 Śramaṇa 7th century Buddhist, 8th century Jain. Both paras refer to caste and Brahmins. This belongs here, not under "Usage of Sramana in Jain texts".
- 05:1305:13, 10 February 2012 diff hist +73 Śramaṇa →Śramaṇa movement: I think at the very least it needs to be mentioned that Ananda Guruge is an international Buddhist preacher and leader.
- 05:0705:07, 10 February 2012 diff hist +3,621 User talk:Mayasutra →WRT shramana: new section
- 04:2604:26, 10 February 2012 diff hist −133 Śramaṇa Well with all due respect, Mayasutra, you MOVED my content around first.
- 04:0904:09, 10 February 2012 diff hist +8 Śramaṇa moved paragraphs around, their earlier location lacked context.
- 03:5703:57, 10 February 2012 diff hist −13 Śramaṇa →Śramaṇa movement: I don;t think calling a traditional practice names like "parrot-like" is necessary on wikipedia. Just like we don't use adjectives like "abominable" or "disgraceful" when talking about nude ascetics.
- 03:5403:54, 10 February 2012 diff hist +6 Śramaṇa The reference says "other".
- 02:5302:53, 10 February 2012 diff hist +548 Śramaṇa →Śramaṇa movement: added material about Jain law books
- 02:1902:19, 10 February 2012 diff hist +344 Śramaṇa →Śramaṇa movement: Added material on Mahavira's Brahmin disciples
- 02:0802:08, 10 February 2012 diff hist −2 Śramaṇa →Śramaṇa movement: moved up the Collins statement to match with another related statement from his book
- 02:0502:05, 10 February 2012 diff hist +243 Śramaṇa →Śramaṇa movement: Added material about Kshatriya prominence
- 01:4801:48, 10 February 2012 diff hist −68 Śramaṇa →Śramaṇa movement: Nothing is mentioned in the quote about Brahmin's karma vs Jain karma or buddhist karma. Either the quote needs to be shifted, or the preceding sentence has to be modified.
- 01:4001:40, 10 February 2012 diff hist +1,043 Śramaṇa →Śramaṇa movement: Added material from a reference that has been cited multiple times in this article previously
- 01:2201:22, 10 February 2012 diff hist +54 Śramaṇa Undid revision 476043322 by Mayasutra (talk) The quote here denies all sorts of Karma, not just Brahmins'. If your source talks only about Brahmins' karma, kindly write that quote instead.
9 February 2012
- 16:5816:58, 9 February 2012 diff hist +54 Śramaṇa →Śramaṇa movement: The quote is about Karma, not about Brahmins. So why talk about Brahmins specifically, when Buddha and Mahavira also believed greatly in Karma?
8 February 2012
- 06:0806:08, 8 February 2012 diff hist +1,588 Advaita Vedanta Undid revision 475700867 by SaibAbaVenkatesh (talk)Provided quotes as requested.
- 06:0306:03, 8 February 2012 diff hist +1,325 Talk:Advaita Vedanta →From early Vedanta to Kashmir Shaivism: Gaudapada, Bhartrhari, and Abhinavagupta. By N. V. Isaeva. p202
- 04:3904:39, 8 February 2012 diff hist +166 Talk:Advaita Vedanta →From early Vedanta to Kashmir Shaivism: Gaudapada, Bhartrhari, and Abhinavagupta. By N. V. Isaeva. p202
- 03:0403:04, 8 February 2012 diff hist +444 Upanishads Added material from a citation that already existed in the article to provide a balanced picture, as provided in the reference itself.
- 02:5902:59, 8 February 2012 diff hist +594 Talk:Upanishads →Regarding recent POV-pusing
- 02:5502:55, 8 February 2012 diff hist +403 Talk:Upanishads →Regarding recent POV-pusing
- 02:5102:51, 8 February 2012 diff hist +423 Talk:Advaita Vedanta →From early Vedanta to Kashmir Shaivism: Gaudapada, Bhartrhari, and Abhinavagupta. By N. V. Isaeva. p202
- 00:0900:09, 8 February 2012 diff hist +4 Talk:Upanishads →Regarding recent POV-pusing
7 February 2012
- 23:0623:06, 7 February 2012 diff hist +1,510 Talk:Upanishads →Regarding recent POV-pusing
- 22:5122:51, 7 February 2012 diff hist −191 Upanishads Undid revision 475522000 by SaibAbaVenkatesh (talk) Kindly see talk page.
- 22:4122:41, 7 February 2012 diff hist +101 Talk:Advaita Vedanta →From early Vedanta to Kashmir Shaivism: Gaudapada, Bhartrhari, and Abhinavagupta. By N. V. Isaeva. p202
- 22:4122:41, 7 February 2012 diff hist +1,107 Talk:Advaita Vedanta →From early Vedanta to Kashmir Shaivism: Gaudapada, Bhartrhari, and Abhinavagupta. By N. V. Isaeva. p202
6 February 2012
- 00:4500:45, 6 February 2012 diff hist +216 User talk:Ism schism →Upanishad article
- 00:3400:34, 6 February 2012 diff hist +6 Upanishads No edit summary
- 00:2900:29, 6 February 2012 diff hist +90 User talk:Ism schism →Upanishad article: new section
- 00:2800:28, 6 February 2012 diff hist +275 Upanishads Undid revision 475312759 by Ism schism (talk) I think my changes reflect the page as it used to be earlier. Ism Schism, please discuss on talk page.
- 00:0700:07, 6 February 2012 diff hist +17 Upanishads →Schools of Vedānta: What is a "mainstream" Hindu position? Sankara's
5 February 2012
- 23:4723:47, 5 February 2012 diff hist +31 Upanishads →Development: Separate segment to describe number of Upanishads
- 23:4023:40, 5 February 2012 diff hist +477 Upanishads When the history section here states that dating is controversial and many opinions exist, why give any conclusive statements in the Lead? Moved authorship and dating lower, with summaries in Lead.
- 23:2423:24, 5 February 2012 diff hist −250 Upanishads The history clearly states that many Upanishads show Buddhist influence, then why "Although they were influenced by the Shramana movement, they are considered fully Brahminical Sruti"?What is "fully brahminical" anyway?
2 February 2012
- 00:3400:34, 2 February 2012 diff hist 0 Advaita Vedanta →Advaita and other Indian philosophies: Yamunacharya and Ramanuja's views on Advaita should come under the relationship with other forms of Vedanta, in my view.
1 February 2012
- 02:1302:13, 1 February 2012 diff hist +12 Advaita Vedanta →Relation to other philosophies
- 02:1002:10, 1 February 2012 diff hist +1,049 Advaita Vedanta →Relation to other philosophies: Sorely lacks material on Dvaita and other forms of Vedanta, and what their debates with Advaita were.
