User contributions for Dark Laughter

23 March 2010

• 03:0603:06, 23 March 2010 diff hist −343‎ Wendy Doniger ‎ Who on earth cares what someone says in an EMAIL?? Worthwhile work is published properly, surely?
• 02:5302:53, 23 March 2010 diff hist +9‎ Manichaeism ‎ I improved the language
• 02:4802:48, 23 March 2010 diff hist −14‎ Manichaeism ‎ Other cosmologies have had good vs. evil struggles too, so I removed the implication that Manichaeism is the only religion that would teach anything like this
• 02:4002:40, 23 March 2010 diff hist −24‎ Manichaeism ‎ I improved the language
• 02:3202:32, 23 March 2010 diff hist −3‎ Michael Cremo ‎ I made another grammatical correction. One labels something pseudoscience. One does not label it "as" pseudoscience
• 02:3002:30, 23 March 2010 diff hist +4‎ Michael Cremo ‎ Added necessary word
• 02:2902:29, 23 March 2010 diff hist −7‎ Michael Cremo ‎ This is simply an edit to correct the grammar of this article. Hopefully that will be acceptable
• 00:1700:17, 23 March 2010 diff hist −1‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎ISKCON and evolution
• 00:1200:12, 23 March 2010 diff hist −1‎ Michael Cremo ‎No edit summary
• 00:1100:11, 23 March 2010 diff hist 0‎ Michael Cremo ‎No edit summary
• 00:1000:10, 23 March 2010 diff hist −44‎ Michael Cremo ‎No edit summary
• 00:0600:06, 23 March 2010 diff hist −9‎ Michael Cremo ‎No edit summary
• 00:0500:05, 23 March 2010 diff hist −5‎ International Society for Krishna Consciousness ‎ Made the article more accurate
• 00:0200:02, 23 March 2010 diff hist −9‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎ISKCON and evolution
• 00:0100:01, 23 March 2010 diff hist +4‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎ISKCON and evolution
• 00:0000:00, 23 March 2010 diff hist +3‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎ISKCON and evolution

22 March 2010

• 23:5923:59, 22 March 2010 diff hist −1‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎ISKCON and evolution
• 23:5723:57, 22 March 2010 diff hist −900‎ Islam and other religions ‎ Using the Koran as a source for claims about Islam or about what Muslims supposedly think is totally silly. They often interpret it differently, you know

21 February 2010

• 20:2620:26, 21 February 2010 diff hist −1,029‎ International Society for Krishna Consciousness ‎ Remove rubbish/trivia
• 20:2120:21, 21 February 2010 diff hist −25‎ International Society for Krishna Consciousness ‎ →‎2000 to the present
• 20:1520:15, 21 February 2010 diff hist −45‎ International Society for Krishna Consciousness ‎ corrected prose
• 19:5319:53, 21 February 2010 diff hist −18‎ International Society for Krishna Consciousness ‎No edit summary
• 19:4819:48, 21 February 2010 diff hist −6‎ International Society for Krishna Consciousness ‎ tried to make lead clearer
• 19:4519:45, 21 February 2010 diff hist −14‎ Blade Runner ‎ Not an improvement - text added not well written
• 19:3519:35, 21 February 2010 diff hist −41‎ Hindu cosmology ‎ interesting but non-relevant fact

20 February 2010

• 21:3521:35, 20 February 2010 diff hist −9‎ Blade Runner ‎No edit summary
• 21:1921:19, 20 February 2010 diff hist −48‎ International Society for Krishna Consciousness ‎ garbled prose corrected
• 07:2807:28, 20 February 2010 diff hist +114‎ Talk:Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎Blavatsky's view
• 03:0303:03, 20 February 2010 diff hist +11‎ Life — How Did It Get Here? By Evolution or by Creation? ‎No edit summary
• 03:0103:01, 20 February 2010 diff hist +5‎ Day-age creationism ‎No edit summary
• 02:5202:52, 20 February 2010 diff hist −15‎ Young Earth creationism ‎ Undid revision 345109949 by 204.44.5.4 (talk) undid nasty edit
• 02:4902:49, 20 February 2010 diff hist −28‎ Old Earth creationism ‎ not relevant

19 February 2010

• 19:2019:20, 19 February 2010 diff hist 0‎ Young Earth creationism ‎No edit summary
• 19:1519:15, 19 February 2010 diff hist +9‎ Deism ‎No edit summary
• 19:1219:12, 19 February 2010 diff hist −22‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎Hindu opposition to Christian Creationism
• 19:0819:08, 19 February 2010 diff hist −68‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎ You consider it necessary to say that "views on evolution" includes "viewpoints in regards to evolution"?
• 19:0319:03, 19 February 2010 diff hist +550‎ Talk:Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎Blavatsky's view
• 18:5518:55, 19 February 2010 diff hist −5‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎No edit summary
• 18:5318:53, 19 February 2010 diff hist −63‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎No edit summary

17 February 2010

• 06:5806:58, 17 February 2010 diff hist +621‎ Talk:Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎Blavatsky's view: new section
• 06:5306:53, 17 February 2010 diff hist +252‎ Talk:Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎Iskcon members ("Hare Krishnas") are NOT HINDUS
• 03:2803:28, 17 February 2010 diff hist −3‎ Talk:Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎Iskcon members ("Hare Krishnas") are NOT HINDUS
• 03:2803:28, 17 February 2010 diff hist +441‎ Talk:Hindu views on evolution ‎ →‎Iskcon members ("Hare Krishnas") are NOT HINDUS
• 03:2003:20, 17 February 2010 diff hist +212‎ User talk:Abecedare ‎No edit summary
• 03:1703:17, 17 February 2010 diff hist +87‎ User talk:Dark Laughter ‎No edit summary
• 03:1503:15, 17 February 2010 diff hist +186‎ User talk:Abecedare ‎No edit summary
• 03:1203:12, 17 February 2010 diff hist +163‎ Talk:Hindu views on evolution ‎No edit summary
• 03:1003:10, 17 February 2010 diff hist +184‎ User talk:Dark Laughter ‎ →‎February 2010
• 02:5402:54, 17 February 2010 diff hist +316‎ Talk:Hindu views on evolution ‎No edit summary
• 02:5102:51, 17 February 2010 diff hist −2,644‎ Hindu views on evolution ‎ ISKCON members are as noted not Hindus. Swami Prabhupada was very emphatic about this Tag: references removed