User contributions for Bodhiupasaka
Appearance
A user with 364 edits. Account created on 3 January 2020.
9 June 2024
- 05:4205:42, 9 June 2024 diff hist −30 m Āḷāra Kālāma No Buddhist scripture mentions that Alara Kalama was a teacher of Samkhya. Hence no scriptural basis. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
18 May 2024
- 07:3507:35, 18 May 2024 diff hist −49 m South Korea Refer the source. It is 14th, not 12th. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
13 April 2024
- 18:5118:51, 13 April 2024 diff hist −6,244 Talk:Shakya Fixed page Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 18:5018:50, 13 April 2024 diff hist +7,006 Talk:Shakya →Kshatriya: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 13:5613:56, 13 April 2024 diff hist −313 m Shakya Read Levman again:"Social class is another example of the difference between the indigenous peoples and the incoming Aryans. The Buddha did not subscribe to the validity of the Aryan fourfold social class system (brāhmaṇa-khattiya-vessa-sudda) for it was not part of his ethnic heritage." Moreover the reference not only conflates the Shakyas as a "Ruling Family", even though it was a "Republic" , not a monarchy. Your reference(published in 2002) is simply inaccurate and wrong. Tags: Manual revert Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 06:5206:52, 13 April 2024 diff hist −313 m Shakya The encyclopaedic reference provided in the previous edit confuses/conflates the Shakyans as a "ruling family" instead of a tribe/clan. Not to mention the rest of wiki article already states the Shakyas did not follow the Varna System. Read the references attributed to Gombrich and Levman. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
11 April 2024
- 04:5704:57, 11 April 2024 diff hist −316 m Shakya The Shakyas did not follow the Vedic religion and hence did not subscribe to the Varna system. They were described as "riff raff and primitive" by actual members of the Vedic Caste System in the Ambattha Sutta as well. Therefore they could not be Kshatriyas. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
29 March 2024
- 15:4515:45, 29 March 2024 diff hist +69 m Pali Devanagari was never historically used to write Pali. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:4415:44, 29 March 2024 diff hist −124 m Pali Redundant , not to mention, th Citezendium article makes claims about "Sanskrit" group of languages which is unsubstantiated. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
28 March 2024
- 07:0207:02, 28 March 2024 diff hist −123 m Amitābha The Pala Empire was immedeiately succeeded by Hindu Empires, not by any Muslim one. The statement that's now removed is Hindutva Nonsense. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
23 February 2024
- 18:0818:08, 23 February 2024 diff hist −38 m Maurya Empire Inclusion of Sanskrit makes no historical sense. How can it be a literary language when the first time it was even attested was in 1st Century BC(refer the Wiki article for list of languages by attested dates), which is well after end of Mauryan Empire that used Prakrit and even Greek for its edicts but never Sanskrit ? Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
18 February 2024
- 06:2206:22, 18 February 2024 diff hist +3,205 User talk:Bodhiupasaka →Regarding your edits in "Women in Hinduism: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
17 February 2024
- 09:1809:18, 17 February 2024 diff hist +464 Women in Hinduism →Vedic literature: To the previous editor:It is Urvashi herself who makes the denigrating blanket statement about women, who else would put these words in her mouth other than the authors of the Vedas themselves ? Also, I love it how you claim the verse is out of context etc because of being "mistranslated" despite the fact that the Vedic verses in the wiki article that also praise women are taken from the same author who translated the Vedic metres to English. Are those Verses that fit yo... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 08:4608:46, 17 February 2024 diff hist −301 m Persecution of Buddhists Makes no grammatical or historical sense, neither is it backed up by any reference. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
5 February 2024
- 06:1806:18, 5 February 2024 diff hist +271 m Women in Hinduism Undid revision 1202375635 by Aayush Bandhyopadhya (talk)If you could give sources that allege that the Wiki Reference itself is made with a Political Agenda in mind or if you could prove, that too with sources that the reference is indeed an interpolation, that would be great. Otherwise this will be taken as pushing one's own biased/unsubstantiated POV. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
31 January 2024
- 18:4018:40, 31 January 2024 diff hist +56 Women in Hinduism Fixed Formatting Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 18:3218:32, 31 January 2024 diff hist +230 m Women in Hinduism Undid revision 1200206864 by Aayush Banerjee (talk)How is it "useless", because it does not conform to your POV ? Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 18:2518:25, 31 January 2024 diff hist −657 m Persecution of Buddhists "Colonial Era Writers" ? Using mythical stories to "construct" Buddhist history ? How nonsensical ! Seems like revisionism/POV pushing. And how does the recent date of a scripture invalidate it by default ? Also the Vedas, Puranas, Bible, Quran etc have many nonsensical passages too, be it talking animals, flying monkeys or Donkeys etc, but that does not delegitimize these scriptures from being used as references by historians for the corroboration of past religious/cultural/political events. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
27 January 2024
- 11:3511:35, 27 January 2024 diff hist +534 m Women in Hinduism Not sure why this part was removed. Seems to be POV pushing. Tag: Visual edit
22 January 2024
- 07:3907:39, 22 January 2024 diff hist +781 Talk:Dashavatara →Wrong Buddha: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic
25 November 2023
- 07:3507:35, 25 November 2023 diff hist −209 Talk:Indo-Aryan languages →Someone please update the classification chart Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 07:3207:32, 25 November 2023 diff hist +2,093 Talk:Indo-Aryan languages →Someone please update the classification chart: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 07:0307:03, 25 November 2023 diff hist −151 m Names for India Removed vague statement since no citation. Continent or (Indian) Sub-continent ? And south of what ? Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
1 October 2023
- 12:0712:07, 1 October 2023 diff hist +524 Talk:Indo-Aryan languages →Someone please update the classification chart: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 11:5111:51, 1 October 2023 diff hist +1,395 Talk:Indo-Aryan languages →Someone please update the classification chart: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 11:4111:41, 1 October 2023 diff hist −93 m Indo-Aryan languages Chart is inaccurate/false. Removing POV pushing. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 11:4011:40, 1 October 2023 diff hist +1,142 Talk:Indo-Aryan languages →Someone please update the classification chart: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 09:2509:25, 1 October 2023 diff hist −93 m Indo-Aryan languages Removed chart for being inaccurate. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 09:2409:24, 1 October 2023 diff hist +234 Talk:Indo-Aryan languages →Someone please update the classification chart: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 09:2209:22, 1 October 2023 diff hist +440 Talk:Indo-Aryan languages →Someone please update the classification chart: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
15 September 2023
- 07:3707:37, 15 September 2023 diff hist +595 Talk:Indo-Aryan languages →Someone please update the classification chart: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic
6 September 2023
- 05:4905:49, 6 September 2023 diff hist −12 m Buddhist influences on Advaita Vedanta Marxist ? His Wiki page makes no mention of the same. Removing Ad Hominem. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
31 August 2023
- 06:1206:12, 31 August 2023 diff hist −73 m Historical Vedic religion IVC was Non Indo-Aryan Civilization. Also the included reference does not cite a page number. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
2 August 2023
- 14:1414:14, 2 August 2023 diff hist −35 m Shailendra dynasty References do not back this. Seems to be later interpolation. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
28 June 2023
- 20:5720:57, 28 June 2023 diff hist −376 m Religion in Kerala The cited reference makes no such claim. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
12 June 2023
- 15:1715:17, 12 June 2023 diff hist +263 User talk:Bodhiupasaka →Infoboxes: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 15:1615:16, 12 June 2023 diff hist +291 m Saraswati Undid revision 1159779819 by Skyerise (talk)The same information is already present in the article. Take your time in reading it instead of making hasty reverts and refer the talk section of the article as well. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 06:5406:54, 12 June 2023 diff hist −123 m Saraswati No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 06:5206:52, 12 June 2023 diff hist +414 m Saraswati Added Parent details in Infobox. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
2 June 2023
- 18:5318:53, 2 June 2023 diff hist +255 User talk:Bodhiupasaka →Reliable sources: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 18:5118:51, 2 June 2023 diff hist +573 Talk:Saraswati →Wisdomlib.org: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 18:4818:48, 2 June 2023 diff hist −92 m Saraswati Facing issues while editing. Reverted back to precious edit. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 18:4618:46, 2 June 2023 diff hist −15 m Saraswati No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 18:4318:43, 2 June 2023 diff hist +15 m Saraswati No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 18:4118:41, 2 June 2023 diff hist −1 m Saraswati Fixed an element error. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 18:3918:39, 2 June 2023 diff hist +93 m Saraswati No edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 18:3518:35, 2 June 2023 diff hist −38 m Saraswati Undid revision 1158164440 by Girth Summit (talk)Will add the original source. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
1 June 2023
- 18:2918:29, 1 June 2023 diff hist +426 User talk:Bodhiupasaka →Reliable sources: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 18:0718:07, 1 June 2023 diff hist +330 User talk:Bodhiupasaka →Reliable sources: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 18:0518:05, 1 June 2023 diff hist +118 m Saraswati Undid revision 1158054855 by Girth Summit (talk)It is not a "blog", it is a scriptural reference, the same which is already used in the body of the article. Take your time in reading the whole article instead of hastily reverting edits by giving vague reasons. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit