User contributions for Bodhiupasaka

For Bodhiupasaka talk block log uploads logs global account filter log
A user with 364 edits. Account created on 3 January 2020.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

9 June 2024

18 May 2024

13 April 2024

  • 18:5118:51, 13 April 2024 diff hist −6,244‎ Talk:Shakya ‎ Fixed page Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 18:5018:50, 13 April 2024 diff hist +7,006‎ Talk:Shakya ‎ →‎Kshatriya: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
  • 13:5613:56, 13 April 2024 diff hist −313‎ m Shakya ‎ Read Levman again:"Social class is another example of the difference between the indigenous peoples and the incoming Aryans. The Buddha did not subscribe to the validity of the Aryan fourfold social class system (brāhmaṇa-khattiya-vessa-sudda) for it was not part of his ethnic heritage." Moreover the reference not only conflates the Shakyas as a "Ruling Family", even though it was a "Republic" , not a monarchy. Your reference(published in 2002) is simply inaccurate and wrong. Tags: Manual revert Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 06:5206:52, 13 April 2024 diff hist −313‎ m Shakya ‎ The encyclopaedic reference provided in the previous edit confuses/conflates the Shakyans as a "ruling family" instead of a tribe/clan. Not to mention the rest of wiki article already states the Shakyas did not follow the Varna System. Read the references attributed to Gombrich and Levman. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

11 April 2024

  • 04:5704:57, 11 April 2024 diff hist −316‎ m Shakya ‎ The Shakyas did not follow the Vedic religion and hence did not subscribe to the Varna system. They were described as "riff raff and primitive" by actual members of the Vedic Caste System in the Ambattha Sutta as well. Therefore they could not be Kshatriyas. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

29 March 2024

28 March 2024

  • 07:0207:02, 28 March 2024 diff hist −123‎ m Amitābha ‎ The Pala Empire was immedeiately succeeded by Hindu Empires, not by any Muslim one. The statement that's now removed is Hindutva Nonsense. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

23 February 2024

  • 18:0818:08, 23 February 2024 diff hist −38‎ m Maurya Empire ‎ Inclusion of Sanskrit makes no historical sense. How can it be a literary language when the first time it was even attested was in 1st Century BC(refer the Wiki article for list of languages by attested dates), which is well after end of Mauryan Empire that used Prakrit and even Greek for its edicts but never Sanskrit ? Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

18 February 2024

17 February 2024

  • 09:1809:18, 17 February 2024 diff hist +464‎ Women in Hinduism ‎ →‎Vedic literature: To the previous editor:It is Urvashi herself who makes the denigrating blanket statement about women, who else would put these words in her mouth other than the authors of the Vedas themselves ? Also, I love it how you claim the verse is out of context etc because of being "mistranslated" despite the fact that the Vedic verses in the wiki article that also praise women are taken from the same author who translated the Vedic metres to English. Are those Verses that fit yo... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 08:4608:46, 17 February 2024 diff hist −301‎ m Persecution of Buddhists ‎ Makes no grammatical or historical sense, neither is it backed up by any reference. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

5 February 2024

  • 06:1806:18, 5 February 2024 diff hist +271‎ m Women in Hinduism ‎ Undid revision 1202375635 by Aayush Bandhyopadhya (talk)If you could give sources that allege that the Wiki Reference itself is made with a Political Agenda in mind or if you could prove, that too with sources that the reference is indeed an interpolation, that would be great. Otherwise this will be taken as pushing one's own biased/unsubstantiated POV. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

31 January 2024

  • 18:4018:40, 31 January 2024 diff hist +56‎ Women in Hinduism ‎ Fixed Formatting Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 18:3218:32, 31 January 2024 diff hist +230‎ m Women in Hinduism ‎ Undid revision 1200206864 by Aayush Banerjee (talk)How is it "useless", because it does not conform to your POV ? Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 18:2518:25, 31 January 2024 diff hist −657‎ m Persecution of Buddhists ‎ "Colonial Era Writers" ? Using mythical stories to "construct" Buddhist history ? How nonsensical ! Seems like revisionism/POV pushing. And how does the recent date of a scripture invalidate it by default ? Also the Vedas, Puranas, Bible, Quran etc have many nonsensical passages too, be it talking animals, flying monkeys or Donkeys etc, but that does not delegitimize these scriptures from being used as references by historians for the corroboration of past religious/cultural/political events. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

27 January 2024

22 January 2024

25 November 2023

1 October 2023

15 September 2023

6 September 2023

31 August 2023

2 August 2023

28 June 2023

12 June 2023

2 June 2023

1 June 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bodhiupasaka"