User contributions for 98.108.141.145

8 December 2009

• 13:5713:57, 8 December 2009 diff hist +155‎ Wikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement ‎ →‎Neutrality questioned
• 13:5113:51, 8 December 2009 diff hist +1,269‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Founded a Movement?
• 06:3906:39, 8 December 2009 diff hist +25‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Section Summary
• 06:3606:36, 8 December 2009 diff hist +7‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Section Summary
• 06:3406:34, 8 December 2009 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 06:2906:29, 8 December 2009 diff hist +514‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 06:2406:24, 8 December 2009 diff hist +756‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 06:0806:08, 8 December 2009 diff hist +392‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Section Summary
• 06:0306:03, 8 December 2009 diff hist −181‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Section Summary
• 05:5905:59, 8 December 2009 diff hist +42‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Section Summary
• 05:5705:57, 8 December 2009 diff hist +107‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 05:5605:56, 8 December 2009 diff hist +123‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 05:5405:54, 8 December 2009 diff hist −295‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 05:4905:49, 8 December 2009 diff hist +390‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 05:4205:42, 8 December 2009 diff hist +415‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 05:3705:37, 8 December 2009 diff hist −6‎ Joseph Smith ‎ BFIZZ, thanks for your proposal and for starting to contribute to the discussion. But I do request that we refrain from more edits of this sourced sentence until the discussion comes to a consensus.
• 02:4002:40, 8 December 2009 diff hist +337‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 02:1402:14, 8 December 2009 diff hist +549‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 02:0902:09, 8 December 2009 diff hist −13‎ Joseph Smith ‎ Foxe, I say again, Please hold your editing powder until there is a consensus. anyone following the discussion for this sentence right now can see its far from over, no consensus yet.

7 December 2009

• 14:3514:35, 7 December 2009 diff hist +588‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Accusations of citation abuse in this article
• 14:2814:28, 7 December 2009 diff hist −13‎ Joseph Smith ‎ Foxe, actually the growth is documented in the second reference. From 2 mil to 13 mil is quite a jump. If you have quality evidence saying otherwise, please join the discussion for this sentence.
• 06:1806:18, 7 December 2009 diff hist −1‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 05:1205:12, 7 December 2009 diff hist −182‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 05:1005:10, 7 December 2009 diff hist +1,273‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 03:4203:42, 7 December 2009 diff hist +13‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 03:4103:41, 7 December 2009 diff hist +3,618‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 03:1403:14, 7 December 2009 diff hist +3‎ Joseph Smith ‎No edit summary
• 03:1303:13, 7 December 2009 diff hist +22‎ Joseph Smith ‎ I agree that adding LDS church "claims" 13 million is better encyclopedia style. But if you allege the church is not growing, especially with the references already provided, please join discussion
• 03:1003:10, 7 December 2009 diff hist +10‎ Joseph Smith ‎ I disagree that the 2003 and 2008 stat references should be merged. They cover different sources at different times. Please join the discussion section for this sentence and explain why they should.
• 02:1002:10, 7 December 2009 diff hist −173‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Accusations of citation abuse in this article
• 02:0502:05, 7 December 2009 diff hist +1,686‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Accusations of citation abuse in this article
• 01:1901:19, 7 December 2009 diff hist −42‎ Joseph Smith ‎ The 13 million figure is sourced, doubters of 13 million haven't yet provided a source for the allegation. Please do not re-delete unless you have strong consensus. See discussion in progress. . .
• 01:1501:15, 7 December 2009 diff hist +1,802‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?

6 December 2009

• 20:5720:57, 6 December 2009 diff hist +12‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated 2008 statistics be deleted?
• 20:5620:56, 6 December 2009 diff hist +248‎ Joseph Smith ‎ Foxe, I am reminding you that deletion of referenced material is a no-no. If you feel the content is misplaced please gain a consensus prior to deletion.
• 20:4920:49, 6 December 2009 diff hist +1,290‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Should updated 2008 statistics be deleted?: new section

19 November 2009

• 06:1206:12, 19 November 2009 diff hist +1,009‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Unprovable non-neutral statements- J.S. Early years. Did he share the First Vision?

16 November 2009

• 03:4203:42, 16 November 2009 diff hist +6‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Unprovable non-neutral statements- J.S. Early years. Did he share the First Vision?
• 03:4103:41, 16 November 2009 diff hist +121‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Unprovable non-neutral statements- J.S. Early years. Did he share the First Vision?
• 03:4103:41, 16 November 2009 diff hist +1,220‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Unprovable non-neutral statements- J.S. Early years. Did he share the First Vision?

1 November 2009

• 21:5421:54, 1 November 2009 diff hist +315‎ User talk:John Foxe ‎ →‎i left a question just for you on the Joseph smith jr discussion page-
• 21:5221:52, 1 November 2009 diff hist +646‎ Talk:Joseph Smith ‎ →‎Joseph Smith Early years - treasure hunting and First Vision