User contributions for 98.108.141.145
Appearance
For 98.108.141.145 talk block log logs global block log filter log
8 December 2009
- 13:5713:57, 8 December 2009 diff hist +155 Wikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement →Neutrality questioned
- 13:5113:51, 8 December 2009 diff hist +1,269 Talk:Joseph Smith →Founded a Movement?
- 06:3906:39, 8 December 2009 diff hist +25 Talk:Joseph Smith →Section Summary
- 06:3606:36, 8 December 2009 diff hist +7 Talk:Joseph Smith →Section Summary
- 06:3406:34, 8 December 2009 diff hist −1 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 06:2906:29, 8 December 2009 diff hist +514 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 06:2406:24, 8 December 2009 diff hist +756 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 06:0806:08, 8 December 2009 diff hist +392 Talk:Joseph Smith →Section Summary
- 06:0306:03, 8 December 2009 diff hist −181 Talk:Joseph Smith →Section Summary
- 05:5905:59, 8 December 2009 diff hist +42 Talk:Joseph Smith →Section Summary
- 05:5705:57, 8 December 2009 diff hist +107 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 05:5605:56, 8 December 2009 diff hist +123 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 05:5405:54, 8 December 2009 diff hist −295 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 05:4905:49, 8 December 2009 diff hist +390 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 05:4205:42, 8 December 2009 diff hist +415 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 05:3705:37, 8 December 2009 diff hist −6 Joseph Smith BFIZZ, thanks for your proposal and for starting to contribute to the discussion. But I do request that we refrain from more edits of this sourced sentence until the discussion comes to a consensus.
- 02:4002:40, 8 December 2009 diff hist +337 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 02:1402:14, 8 December 2009 diff hist +549 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 02:0902:09, 8 December 2009 diff hist −13 Joseph Smith Foxe, I say again, Please hold your editing powder until there is a consensus. anyone following the discussion for this sentence right now can see its far from over, no consensus yet.
7 December 2009
- 14:3514:35, 7 December 2009 diff hist +588 Talk:Joseph Smith →Accusations of citation abuse in this article
- 14:2814:28, 7 December 2009 diff hist −13 Joseph Smith Foxe, actually the growth is documented in the second reference. From 2 mil to 13 mil is quite a jump. If you have quality evidence saying otherwise, please join the discussion for this sentence.
- 06:1806:18, 7 December 2009 diff hist −1 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 05:1205:12, 7 December 2009 diff hist −182 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 05:1005:10, 7 December 2009 diff hist +1,273 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 03:4203:42, 7 December 2009 diff hist +13 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 03:4103:41, 7 December 2009 diff hist +3,618 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 03:1403:14, 7 December 2009 diff hist +3 Joseph Smith No edit summary
- 03:1303:13, 7 December 2009 diff hist +22 Joseph Smith I agree that adding LDS church "claims" 13 million is better encyclopedia style. But if you allege the church is not growing, especially with the references already provided, please join discussion
- 03:1003:10, 7 December 2009 diff hist +10 Joseph Smith I disagree that the 2003 and 2008 stat references should be merged. They cover different sources at different times. Please join the discussion section for this sentence and explain why they should.
- 02:1002:10, 7 December 2009 diff hist −173 Talk:Joseph Smith →Accusations of citation abuse in this article
- 02:0502:05, 7 December 2009 diff hist +1,686 Talk:Joseph Smith →Accusations of citation abuse in this article
- 01:1901:19, 7 December 2009 diff hist −42 Joseph Smith The 13 million figure is sourced, doubters of 13 million haven't yet provided a source for the allegation. Please do not re-delete unless you have strong consensus. See discussion in progress. . .
- 01:1501:15, 7 December 2009 diff hist +1,802 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated, referenced 2008 statistics be deleted?
6 December 2009
- 20:5720:57, 6 December 2009 diff hist +12 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated 2008 statistics be deleted?
- 20:5620:56, 6 December 2009 diff hist +248 Joseph Smith Foxe, I am reminding you that deletion of referenced material is a no-no. If you feel the content is misplaced please gain a consensus prior to deletion.
- 20:4920:49, 6 December 2009 diff hist +1,290 Talk:Joseph Smith →Should updated 2008 statistics be deleted?: new section
19 November 2009
- 06:1206:12, 19 November 2009 diff hist +1,009 Talk:Joseph Smith →Unprovable non-neutral statements- J.S. Early years. Did he share the First Vision?
16 November 2009
- 03:4203:42, 16 November 2009 diff hist +6 Talk:Joseph Smith →Unprovable non-neutral statements- J.S. Early years. Did he share the First Vision?
- 03:4103:41, 16 November 2009 diff hist +121 Talk:Joseph Smith →Unprovable non-neutral statements- J.S. Early years. Did he share the First Vision?
- 03:4103:41, 16 November 2009 diff hist +1,220 Talk:Joseph Smith →Unprovable non-neutral statements- J.S. Early years. Did he share the First Vision?