User contributions for 96.231.138.3

12 September 2021

• 20:2920:29, 12 September 2021 diff hist −4,697‎ Michael Rubin (historian) ‎ Deleted HRW section as it's he said, she said and distorts the bulk of work which has nothing to do with HRW Tag: section blanking

23 May 2021

• 18:0518:05, 23 May 2021 diff hist −2,189‎ Michael Rubin (historian) ‎ Stop vandalizing - the Intercept article says the UAE targeted Rubin but nothing more. Read the article. It does not say what you say. Subsequent Wikileaks documents (https://www.thedailybeast.com/hackers-vow-to-release-apparent-trove-of-uae-ambassadors-emails) show the accusation untrue with regard to Rubin as it showed no communication. Simply airing accusations is not the Wikipedia standard when accusations are disproved. There are FARA documents for the UAE (and every other country) showi... Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 17:5417:54, 23 May 2021 diff hist +99‎ User talk:Nemozen ‎ Showed example of cherry-picking and malicious editing Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 17:4217:42, 23 May 2021 diff hist −2,189‎ Michael Rubin (historian) ‎ This was vandalism. Articles did not say what anonymous author stated, and subsequent information showed anonymous author incorrect. Stop vandalizing page. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 17:0317:03, 23 May 2021 diff hist −2,187‎ Michael Rubin (historian) ‎ STOP VANDALIZING. Accusations are not bio-worthy proof especially when subsequently info (Wikileaks) contradicted accusations and when HRW issued correction on subject of Rubin article. Also deceptive given Rubin is documented to have met with people on all sides of the issue. Vandalizing Wikipedia pages of people with whom you disagree is an abuse of Wikipedia Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit