User contributions for 94.156.40.82

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

03:0003:00, 10 August 2011 diff hist −109‎ Eye color ‎ No, that's not true. Maybe you should double check it to see that they're actually incompatible. It's not reasonable to keep material that is in error.
02:1102:11, 10 August 2011 diff hist −796‎ User talk:94.156.40.82 ‎ ←Replaced content with 'Thank you.'
00:4000:40, 10 August 2011 diff hist −109‎ Eye color ‎ This source contains much information that invalidates the map: http://carnby.altervista.org/lundraces/lundman-races1.htm (Also as per discussions everyone thus far has rejected its reliability, keep bringing it back only damages the article)

23:4623:46, 8 August 2011 diff hist −109‎ Eye color ‎ As stated before, alternative sources disprove the validity of this map. Whoever thinks it's accurate has no place editing this page.
18:5418:54, 8 August 2011 diff hist +52‎ Evenki people ‎ →‎Russische Föderation

22:1022:10, 30 July 2011 diff hist −690‎ User talk:94.156.40.82 ‎ ←Blanked the page
12:1812:18, 30 July 2011 diff hist −109‎ Eye color ‎ Removed map by consensus. Arguments from authority won't work here. Please be constructive or don't change the article.
12:0912:09, 30 July 2011 diff hist +202‎ User talk:Diannaa ‎ →‎IP 94.156.40.82
11:1111:11, 30 July 2011 diff hist −352‎ User talk:94.156.40.82 ‎ ←Blanked the page

16:1916:19, 29 July 2011 diff hist −151‎ Blond ‎ Removed map by consensus.
16:1316:13, 29 July 2011 diff hist +62‎ White Americans ‎ Please check article "African admixture in Europe" for reference.
16:0616:06, 29 July 2011 diff hist +11‎ Eye color ‎ →‎Distribution
16:0316:03, 29 July 2011 diff hist +965‎ Talk:Eye color ‎ →‎Map
14:5214:52, 29 July 2011 diff hist +62‎ White Americans ‎ Sub-Saharan admixture in Southern Europe is fairly common. Y-DNA and MtDNA tests have shown this.
14:3614:36, 29 July 2011 diff hist −85‎ Eye color ‎ →‎Distribution

01:2601:26, 18 July 2011 diff hist −855‎ User talk:94.156.40.82 ‎ ←Blanked the page
01:2001:20, 18 July 2011 diff hist −151‎ Blond ‎ But its accuracy doesn't.
01:1301:13, 18 July 2011 diff hist −426‎ User talk:94.156.40.82 ‎ ←Blanked the page
01:0801:08, 18 July 2011 diff hist −588‎ Eye color ‎No edit summary Tag: references removed
00:5900:59, 18 July 2011 diff hist −151‎ Blond ‎ Well, obviously the map isn't from a reliable source. We can at least remove that.
00:5100:51, 18 July 2011 diff hist −588‎ Eye color ‎ A reliable source is only an accurate source. Tag: references removed
00:2600:26, 18 July 2011 diff hist −1,098‎ User talk:94.156.40.82 ‎ ←Replaced content with '= I see. No need to repeat yourself.'

18:4318:43, 17 July 2011 diff hist +682‎ Blond ‎ This information is more accurate, trust me.
18:1018:10, 17 July 2011 diff hist −475‎ Eye color ‎ Unreliable sources that fail under close scrutiny. Include reasonable sources only. Tag: references removed
17:5417:54, 17 July 2011 diff hist −786‎ User talk:94.156.40.82 ‎ ←Replaced content with 'I hear you.'

22:4422:44, 15 July 2011 diff hist +834‎ Blond ‎ →‎Geographic distribution
21:1821:18, 15 July 2011 diff hist −162‎ Blond ‎ →‎Geographic distribution
20:3920:39, 15 July 2011 diff hist +140‎ White Americans ‎ →‎Admixture
20:3120:31, 15 July 2011 diff hist −50‎ White Brazilians ‎No edit summary
20:0920:09, 15 July 2011 diff hist +49‎ Eye color ‎ Expanations added.
20:0420:04, 15 July 2011 diff hist +64‎ Eye color ‎ →‎Distribution
19:5919:59, 15 July 2011 diff hist −586‎ Eye color ‎ It's impossible for Ukrainian Jews to have over 50% blue eyes when it's not that common even among native Ukrainians. Also, who is the fool who believes that 99% of Estonians have blue eyes? People, please be more critical with your sources. Tag: references removed

21:2821:28, 1 July 2011 diff hist −109‎ Eye color ‎ It's just a highly inaccurate map, already pointed out repeatedly. How on Earth can anyone familiar with anthropology take it seriously?