User contributions for 92.17.192.24

20 February 2024

• 09:1609:16, 20 February 2024 diff hist +1,603‎ Jodie Whittaker ‎ →‎2017–2022: Doctor Who: generally it's best to integrate criticism directly into the relevant articles so that all major views on Whittaker's performance, tenure (criticism/praise/more nuanced arguments etc.) are included roughly in proportion to how widely they are held.
• 09:1109:11, 20 February 2024 diff hist +907‎ Chris Chibnall ‎ →‎Doctor Who: I don’t know if any pro or anti articles are notable for article biographies so we take a gander
• 09:0609:06, 20 February 2024 diff hist +463‎ Spyfall (Doctor Who) ‎ →‎Critical reception Tag: Reverted
• 09:0209:02, 20 February 2024 diff hist +1,238‎ Yasmin Khan (Doctor Who) ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
• 08:5408:54, 20 February 2024 diff hist +522‎ Doctor Who series 13 ‎ →‎Critical reception
• 08:4808:48, 20 February 2024 diff hist +711‎ Ryan Sinclair ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
• 08:4208:42, 20 February 2024 diff hist +470‎ The Woman Who Fell to Earth ‎ →‎Critical response
• 08:3608:36, 20 February 2024 diff hist +49‎ Fugitive Doctor ‎No edit summary
• 08:3208:32, 20 February 2024 diff hist +387‎ Fugitive Doctor ‎ →‎Reception
• 08:3008:30, 20 February 2024 diff hist +277‎ Thirteenth Doctor ‎ Remove “actress/actor”, expand on screen junkie article

19 February 2024

• 21:3621:36, 19 February 2024 diff hist +1,514‎ Talk:Fourteenth Doctor ‎ →‎Should this be merged with the 10th Doctor?: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
• 20:2420:24, 19 February 2024 diff hist −98‎ Thirteenth Doctor ‎ I think the "expand" section could be removed. The section goes into detail on the reviews/generally it's best to integrate criticism directly into the relevant articles so that all major views on Whittaker's performance, tenure (criticism/praise/more nuanced arguments etc.) are included roughly in proportion to how widely they are held.
• 20:1820:18, 19 February 2024 diff hist −4‎ The Doctor (Doctor Who) ‎ change link to time machine. turn paragraph around changing actors

18 February 2024

• 17:3417:34, 18 February 2024 diff hist +9‎ Phoenix Islands ‎No edit summary
• 17:3417:34, 18 February 2024 diff hist +22‎ Howland and Baker Islands ‎No edit summary
• 17:3017:30, 18 February 2024 diff hist +911‎ TIGHAR ‎ Add information about founder Tag: Reverted
• 17:2917:29, 18 February 2024 diff hist +126‎ Nikumaroro ‎ USCGC Itasca probably has nothing to with this article; replace with Phoenix Islands link
• 17:1117:11, 18 February 2024 diff hist −27‎ USCGC Itasca (1929) ‎ Omit "headed to the area of the last radio transmission"; the crew wouldn't know exactly where the plane was when the last transmission was sent; the book makes it clear that the Commander Thompson took a guess that it was to the North Tag: Reverted
• 17:0417:04, 18 February 2024 diff hist +13‎ Howland Island ‎ I think Howland's claim to fame is the fact it is the island they never reached. Add link to Bounty munity. Having re-read the book "Finding Amelia", it seems that the idea the plane landed on another atoll was considered seriously be the search team back in 1937. It was initially refuted when all the islands were checked, until the Gardner Island theory came into being, due to "signs of recent habitation". Replace with image of Earhart and Noonan to remind that Noonan was a missing person too
• 16:3716:37, 18 February 2024 diff hist +96‎ Lockheed Model 10 Electra ‎No edit summary
• 16:2516:25, 18 February 2024 diff hist +508‎ Talk:Amelia Earhart ‎ →‎Split
• 16:2216:22, 18 February 2024 diff hist +42‎ David W. Jourdan ‎No edit summary
• 16:1916:19, 18 February 2024 diff hist −44‎ Elgen Long ‎ Add link to fellow crash and sink researcher David Jourdan.
• 16:0516:05, 18 February 2024 diff hist +144‎ Amelia (film) ‎ From most reviews in the "reception" section, it seems that most critics felt that the cast were wasted. It could be written to explain why this film got a lot of heat upon its release. Anne Thompson's review goes into detail about the changing screenplays and the finished result. Considering it follows the last decade of the subject's life, it could be argued the 1976 miniseries follows the life more closely

17 February 2024

• 21:3621:36, 17 February 2024 diff hist +8,547‎ Fred Noonan ‎ Age is not necessary for a Third Party Presumption. Add information from the book "Finding Amelia"

15 February 2024

• 16:1116:11, 15 February 2024 diff hist +74‎ Andrew Irvine (mountaineer) ‎ Considering it is not known for certain if Mallory died on June 8 or 9 June, should this also apply to Irvine? Put quotes by friends on "Everest" section
• 15:5815:58, 15 February 2024 diff hist +1,090‎ George Mallory ‎ Remove already established link to Irvine; we don't know if they reached the summit, much less if it was BOTH. Shorten details, the number of close "76" years is unnecessary, the date is more than enough. Add quote to Mallory's grandson in article and circumstantial evidence (the missing photo) from Irvine article

12 February 2024

• 23:1723:17, 12 February 2024 diff hist +171‎ David Amess ‎ →‎Legacy: Recent article says Statue will be placed in April
• 20:2420:24, 12 February 2024 diff hist +484‎ User talk:ITBF ‎ →‎Possible split: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic

9 February 2024

• 17:4617:46, 9 February 2024 diff hist +4,548‎ Jim Leavelle ‎ In his Warren Commission testimony, Leavelle could remember very little about his interactions with the investigation and also admitted he had little to do with the investigation. The testimony and writings from 63/64 were superior. These were obtained when the event was still fresh. Add links to Leavelle