User contributions for 86.104.57.160
Appearance
For 86.104.57.160 talk block log logs filter log
22 December 2011
- 23:3523:35, 22 December 2011 diff hist +352 Side-by-side assembly →Operation
- 23:2023:20, 22 December 2011 diff hist +335 Side-by-side assembly →Activation Contexts
- 23:0923:09, 22 December 2011 diff hist +583 Side-by-side assembly Bye, bye hell. Say hello to pollution.
- 22:4222:42, 22 December 2011 diff hist +1,418 Side-by-side assembly →WinSxS
- 21:4721:47, 22 December 2011 diff hist 0 Side-by-side assembly No edit summary
- 21:4721:47, 22 December 2011 diff hist +50 Side-by-side assembly No edit summary
- 21:4321:43, 22 December 2011 diff hist +782 Side-by-side assembly the Installer owns you :-)
- 21:1421:14, 22 December 2011 diff hist −27 Side-by-side assembly I should have said prominent from Vista onwards, because it existed in XP as well, but it wasn't used as much by the OS. Better not delve into this in the first sentence.
- 21:1121:11, 22 December 2011 diff hist +420 Side-by-side assembly No edit summary
- 17:0017:00, 22 December 2011 diff hist +145 Hotfix →Details
- 16:4616:46, 22 December 2011 diff hist −1 Features new to Windows XP →Side-by-side (SxS) assemblies
- 16:4516:45, 22 December 2011 diff hist +62 Features new to Windows XP →Application isolation
- 16:3916:39, 22 December 2011 diff hist −1 Side-by-side assembly →Disadvantages
- 16:3316:33, 22 December 2011 diff hist +201 Side-by-side assembly →Disadvantages
- 16:3016:30, 22 December 2011 diff hist +205 Features new to Windows XP →Side-by-side (SxS) assemblies
20 December 2011
- 21:3421:34, 20 December 2011 diff hist +137 Windows Runtime →External links: Probably the most informative talk on the WinRT guts
- 17:2617:26, 20 December 2011 diff hist 0 Windows Runtime WinRT is only for building Metro apps right now.
- 17:2517:25, 20 December 2011 diff hist −248 Windows Runtime He is wrong WinRT about replacing Win32 (MS guys like Herb Sutter say otherwise), and how many citations do you need for the fact that WinRT exits? Tag: references removed
- 17:1917:19, 20 December 2011 diff hist +170 Windows Runtime →Technology: again not true
- 17:1217:12, 20 December 2011 diff hist −154 Windows Runtime →Technology: it does not
- 17:1017:10, 20 December 2011 diff hist +728 Windows Runtime No edit summary
- 15:4815:48, 20 December 2011 diff hist +229 Visual Studio →Upcoming version
- 15:4315:43, 20 December 2011 diff hist +92 Windows Runtime →History
- 15:3615:36, 20 December 2011 diff hist +192 Windows Runtime No edit summary
- 15:1115:11, 20 December 2011 diff hist +2 Windows Runtime No edit summary
- 15:0715:07, 20 December 2011 diff hist +41 Class (computer programming) →Partial
- 15:0615:06, 20 December 2011 diff hist +24 Windows Runtime No edit summary
- 15:0515:05, 20 December 2011 diff hist +1,079 Windows Runtime No edit summary
- 11:4811:48, 20 December 2011 diff hist +321 Active Template Library →History and use
- 02:3202:32, 20 December 2011 diff hist +2 Active Template Library →History and use
- 02:3102:31, 20 December 2011 diff hist +425 Active Template Library No edit summary
- 02:1302:13, 20 December 2011 diff hist +313 Active Template Library No edit summary
- 01:4601:46, 20 December 2011 diff hist +82 Windows Runtime No edit summary
- 01:4401:44, 20 December 2011 diff hist +216 Windows Runtime No edit summary
- 00:4900:49, 20 December 2011 diff hist +14 Windows Runtime No edit summary
- 00:4800:48, 20 December 2011 diff hist −38 Windows Runtime No edit summary
- 00:3900:39, 20 December 2011 diff hist +1,012 Windows Runtime instead of bland and meaningless PR, some actual facts
19 December 2011
- 23:5023:50, 19 December 2011 diff hist +119 Windows Runtime →C/C++
- 23:2723:27, 19 December 2011 diff hist +312 C++/CLI C++/CX: basic idea
- 13:4113:41, 19 December 2011 diff hist +12 Name mangling →External links
- 13:4013:40, 19 December 2011 diff hist +56 Name mangling →External links
- 13:2713:27, 19 December 2011 diff hist +166 Name mangling →How different compilers mangle the same functions: don't have it to test, but this is what their reply was in 2008
18 December 2011
- 17:5217:52, 18 December 2011 diff hist +181 Talk:Name mangling →Do C++-only linkers exist?: new section
- 17:4117:41, 18 December 2011 diff hist +122 Name mangling →External links
- 16:5016:50, 18 December 2011 diff hist +60 Talk:Name mangling →Name mangling in Delphi
- 16:4816:48, 18 December 2011 diff hist +159 Talk:Name mangling →IBM compilers?: new section
- 16:3916:39, 18 December 2011 diff hist +175 Name mangling →How different compilers mangle the same functions: Fix the confusing table hearder. VC++ is the only compiler that has an article for its name magling.
- 16:2916:29, 18 December 2011 diff hist +57 Microsoft Visual C++ →Issues
- 16:2316:23, 18 December 2011 diff hist +1 Name mangling →How different compilers mangle the same functions: no change for these
- 16:1716:17, 18 December 2011 diff hist +132 Name mangling →Standardised name mangling in C++: Repeat from above.