User contributions for 77.102.101.220
Appearance
For 77.102.101.220 talk block log logs filter log
16 June 2011
- 22:3922:39, 16 June 2011 diff hist +129 Talk:Miller cycle →simple question...
- 22:3822:38, 16 June 2011 diff hist +1,105 Talk:Miller cycle →simple question...: new section
- 22:2022:20, 16 June 2011 diff hist +969 Talk:Nissan Cedric →Is this correct?: new section
- 22:1722:17, 16 June 2011 diff hist +363 Talk:Nissan Cedric →Need Photos
13 June 2011
- 20:3020:30, 13 June 2011 diff hist +445 User talk:77.102.101.220 →Using "Show preview" button might help.
12 June 2011
- 20:5720:57, 12 June 2011 diff hist −5 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: ok, screw it, no-one who can't use a calculator to do x(1.6093/4.546) in the first place is actually going to care about km/L for this car anyway.
- 20:5620:56, 12 June 2011 diff hist 0 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: anyone wanna tell me why Bar-firsttarget-space-secondtarget-Bar works for power but not economy?
- 20:5520:55, 12 June 2011 diff hist +4 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: what, it's "mpgimp" with no spaces. MP Gimp. OK. Right. Whatever. Let's just make this work, yes?
- 20:5320:53, 12 June 2011 diff hist +1 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: auuugh
- 20:5320:53, 12 June 2011 diff hist −1 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: ¬_¬ ok getting slightly annoyed...
- 20:5320:53, 12 June 2011 diff hist 0 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: ruddy hell, no-one's implemented DWIM on this then? :)
- 20:5220:52, 12 June 2011 diff hist +4 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: ok I'm gonna go ahead & assume it's mpg IMPERIAL as that's far, far more likely what the source said, and 87mpg US is faintly unbelievable even for a bubble car
- 20:5120:51, 12 June 2011 diff hist +3 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: whoops didn't alter the conversion :p
- 20:4920:49, 12 June 2011 diff hist −8 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: ookay let's make it simpler
- 20:4820:48, 12 June 2011 diff hist +25 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: why "convert" the other figures, but not this one? let's see if throwing guesswork at the tool works THIS time
- 20:4720:47, 12 June 2011 diff hist 0 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: one of these days wiki is going to introduce a tool that works in a comprehensible and intuitive manner. until then, i'm going to keep cocking it up first time out...
- 20:4620:46, 12 June 2011 diff hist +4 Messerschmitt KR200 →Tandem seating: fixing this as per the previous overly-simplified conversion. Taking a 2-place original figure, converting it to 1-place in different units, then converting back to the original as 1-place again = BAD IDEA DON'T DO IT AGAIN PLZ
- 20:4520:45, 12 June 2011 diff hist 0 Messerschmitt KR200 →History: giving outputs without decimals at this low level is simply asking for rounding-error trouble, which i think is reflected in the later back-conversion from "7"kw to only *9* hp...
- 20:4120:41, 12 June 2011 diff hist 0 Microcar →History: oops forgot my precision
- 20:4120:41, 12 June 2011 diff hist 0 Microcar →History: just remembered that the USA model demanded a totally ludicrous 1-litre powerplant for some reason ;)
- 20:3820:38, 12 June 2011 diff hist +30 Microcar →History: making this a bit more international - speaking as a brit, even as something of an international minded petrolhead I have only a vague idea of what a geo metro is. Not all wiki readers are from the USA. But a 80s VW Polo was 765kg...
- 20:3520:35, 12 June 2011 diff hist +11 Microcar →Legal position: unverifiable meddling aside, available information on the Messerschmitt says it'll do 78mph, not 90. Which is still pretty good for 20hp in anything that isn't actually a motorcycle... (a normal car would need ~35hp)
- 20:3320:33, 12 June 2011 diff hist +1 FMR Tg500 →Data: enough of the dreaming, hey? the linked sources say 78mph and 28 seconds, why don't we stick to that? unless of course you have a reliable, citeable source that says otherwise?
- 20:3020:30, 12 June 2011 diff hist −2 FMR Tg500 →Performance: no... never mind ... the result was correct, but it showed the decimal for mph. let's just assume their conversion-fu is as questionable as wiki's used to be...
- 20:3020:30, 12 June 2011 diff hist +2 FMR Tg500 →Performance: experiment: the source says 125km/h, which can also be rounded to 78mph. maybe putting a slightly different figure into the converter can tweak the output?
- 20:2920:29, 12 June 2011 diff hist −2 FMR Tg500 →Performance: more back-to-front conversions (Motorbase gives it in mph first, we must assume they measured in mph then converted), and the source page says 82mph for the Sprite, not 78. I suspect fiddling for propaganda purposes...?!
- 20:2520:25, 12 June 2011 diff hist 0 FMR Tg500 Using the "convert" tool to show 0-60mph times... that were originally measured in mph... by converting FROM 97km/h back to mph. The mind absolutely boggles.
- 20:2320:23, 12 June 2011 diff hist +292 Talk:FMR Tg500 →top speed?
- 20:2120:21, 12 June 2011 diff hist +246 Talk:FMR Tg500 →removed microcar category
- 20:1920:19, 12 June 2011 diff hist +776 Talk:FMR Tg500 →removed microcar category
- 20:1520:15, 12 June 2011 diff hist +564 Talk:FMR Tg500 →top speed?: new section
- 20:0720:07, 12 June 2011 diff hist +99 Talk:Tata Pixel →Wow, so many problems with this...
- 20:0720:07, 12 June 2011 diff hist +190 Talk:Tata Pixel →Wow, so many problems with this...
- 20:0520:05, 12 June 2011 diff hist +65 Talk:Tata Pixel No edit summary
- 20:0320:03, 12 June 2011 diff hist +1,721 Talk:Tata Pixel →Wow, so many problems with this...: new section
4 June 2011
- 11:4311:43, 4 June 2011 diff hist +40 Control-C →In graphical environments: pretty funny qwerty keyboard that has P at the left side of the bottom row
14 April 2011
- 06:5306:53, 14 April 2011 diff hist +313 User talk:Yerpo →supercars
- 06:5106:51, 14 April 2011 diff hist −1 User talk:Yerpo →supercars
- 06:5106:51, 14 April 2011 diff hist +980 User talk:Yerpo →supercars
- 06:4706:47, 14 April 2011 diff hist +429 User talk:77.102.101.220 →External links
9 April 2011
- 13:1713:17, 9 April 2011 diff hist 0 Super Cars →Cars: nggh NOW NOW it works. stupid weblinks based on code numbers... captcha: Dicktheir
- 13:1513:15, 9 April 2011 diff hist +231 Super Cars →Cars: 'scuse my dust, those last ones didn't work thanks to typos but they're fixed now
- 13:1213:12, 9 April 2011 diff hist −2 Super Cars →External links: ffs has the wikipedia link code layout changed then?
- 13:1213:12, 9 April 2011 diff hist +2 Super Cars →External links: once again i also fail at linking. but at least i tested it ;) hopefully this works?
- 13:1113:11, 9 April 2011 diff hist +231 Super Cars if you're going to take out the illustrative screenshot links (don't know why) you could at least make sure the singular Mobygames link at the bottom works
- 13:0613:06, 9 April 2011 diff hist +494 Talk:Super Cars →proposed merge
- 13:0313:03, 9 April 2011 diff hist +5 Super Cars →Cars
- 13:0213:02, 9 April 2011 diff hist +423 User talk:Yerpo →supercars: new section
- 12:5912:59, 9 April 2011 diff hist +175 Super Cars →Cars
- 12:5612:56, 9 April 2011 diff hist +48 Super Cars what exactly are the "usual" upgrades? SC is reasonably unique in what it offers for sale and how they work (and disappear after each race) anyway...