User contributions for 71.198.34.87

27 February 2010

• 11:0411:04, 27 February 2010 diff hist +24‎ Island fox ‎ →‎Federal protection: TNC controls 75% of Santa Cruz
• 10:4610:46, 27 February 2010 diff hist −16‎ Canidae ‎ →‎Characteristics: clarification about which item the dog is excepted from

9 February 2010

• 07:0607:06, 9 February 2010 diff hist +127‎ Talk:John Paul Jones ‎ Undid revision 340476771 by Momusufan (talk)
• 05:3205:32, 9 February 2010 diff hist +16‎ Ketotifen ‎ dissecting parenthetical smashup for clarity

28 January 2010

• 02:4702:47, 28 January 2010 diff hist +127‎ Talk:John Paul Jones ‎ →‎A story about John Paul Jones: Once upon a time...

30 December 2009

• 20:0620:06, 30 December 2009 diff hist +222‎ Talk:Editor war ‎ →‎What? Military conflict infobox?: Is there a memorial page of removed articles etc? It's a wiki, eh?

5 December 2009

• 02:0402:04, 5 December 2009 diff hist +285‎ Talk:Leap year ‎ →‎ERROR - 2000 was NOT a leap year: regarding the where-with-all to get around Wikipedia and all the channels needed to perform an official change
• 02:0002:00, 5 December 2009 diff hist +200‎ Talk:Leap year ‎ →‎Leaplings? Leapers? What are Leap Year Babies called? LEAPLE!!!: what is A leap year baby called?

28 November 2009

• 19:4619:46, 28 November 2009 diff hist +38‎ Access Linux Platform ‎ →‎Base frameworks: wlinks
• 19:4319:43, 28 November 2009 diff hist +27‎ Cramfs ‎ →‎Design: wlink
• 19:3419:34, 28 November 2009 diff hist +22‎ Greasemonkey ‎ →‎Equivalents for other browsers: Not according to the IE7Pro article. "User scripting" is not among the listed features.

24 November 2009

• 06:1806:18, 24 November 2009 diff hist −79‎ Archaeal Richmond Mine acidophilic nanoorganisms ‎ →‎Cell structure and Ecology: you know what, I did the math again. It's not that astounding.
• 02:1302:13, 24 November 2009 diff hist +12‎ Archaeal Richmond Mine acidophilic nanoorganisms ‎ →‎Cell structure and Ecology: cubed
• 02:1002:10, 24 November 2009 diff hist +85‎ Archaeal Richmond Mine acidophilic nanoorganisms ‎ →‎Cell structure and Ecology: apples comparison
• 00:2000:20, 24 November 2009 diff hist +1,735‎ Talk:Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket ‎ →‎Why VAriable? What's the point? Isn't that inefficient?

21 November 2009

• 18:2318:23, 21 November 2009 diff hist +872‎ Talk:Voynich manuscript ‎ →‎www.voynich.nl: i figured it out

30 October 2009

• 07:0607:06, 30 October 2009 diff hist +387‎ Talk:Vergonha ‎ →‎Patois? Really?Or propaganda?: self defense
• 07:0007:00, 30 October 2009 diff hist +28‎ Talk:Vergonha ‎ →‎Patois? Really?Or propaganda?: [[unsigned|86.196.255.146}}
• 06:5506:55, 30 October 2009 diff hist +596‎ Talk:Vergonha ‎ →‎Patois? Really?Or propaganda?
• 06:4506:45, 30 October 2009 diff hist +39‎ File talk:Frau-2.jpg ‎ →‎Don't womans have pubic hair: new section

29 October 2009

• 08:2108:21, 29 October 2009 diff hist +13‎ Clueless (disambiguation) ‎ state of not having a clue

14 October 2009

• 08:4008:40, 14 October 2009 diff hist +1,687‎ Clean climbing ‎ →‎Rock Preservation: new section, move part of lede here, expand.
• 07:5107:51, 14 October 2009 diff hist +278‎ Clean climbing ‎ Lede now is not specific to period.
• 07:4107:41, 14 October 2009 diff hist −45‎ Big wall climbing ‎ →‎Classic climbs in Yosemite National Park: removing a lot of routes which aren't "big wall" climbs. Royal Arches? Snake Dike? Nutcracker???? C'mon
• 07:3807:38, 14 October 2009 diff hist +759‎ Big wall climbing ‎ →‎History: additional info
• 07:2407:24, 14 October 2009 diff hist +274‎ List of climbing knots ‎ →‎Hitches: girth hitch, c'mon

12 October 2009

• 04:5704:57, 12 October 2009 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Boxer Rebellion ‎ →‎merge proposal: indent fixes
• 04:5004:50, 12 October 2009 diff hist +395‎ Talk:Boxer Rebellion ‎ →‎merge proposal: don't do it! think of tha childrens!
• 03:4503:45, 12 October 2009 diff hist +8‎ Talk:Clean climbing ‎ →‎Currency since the 1970's?: whoops, didn't preserve original linebreaks
• 03:4303:43, 12 October 2009 diff hist +32‎ Talk:Clean climbing ‎ →‎Currency since the 1970's?: separating section from previous subject.
• 03:3903:39, 12 October 2009 diff hist +2,663‎ Talk:Clean climbing ‎ →‎Edit revert: Expand beyond free climbing... in the Gunks... in the 70's. That's where so much of the misunderstanding came from.
• 01:5401:54, 12 October 2009 diff hist +229‎ Talk:Calamity Jane ‎ →‎Daughters
• 01:4601:46, 12 October 2009 diff hist +4‎ Calamity Jane ‎ →‎Major media appearances: no, these aren't "appearances", she was long deceased for many of them.
• 01:3701:37, 12 October 2009 diff hist −3‎ Fort Laramie Three-Mile Hog Ranch ‎ awkward, unclear wording cleared up (sounded like: other bordellos weren't still standing when they were nominated?)

11 October 2009

• 22:4322:43, 11 October 2009 diff hist +56‎ Clean climbing ‎ →‎Conditions today: including ref., this statement was un-challenged but reference it anyway for completeness/encyclopedicness
• 22:3422:34, 11 October 2009 diff hist +92‎ Grade (climbing) ‎ →‎Clean Scale: including reference
• 22:3222:32, 11 October 2009 diff hist +101‎ Aid climbing ‎ →‎Grading: additional/better ref.
• 22:2622:26, 11 October 2009 diff hist +133‎ Grade (climbing) ‎ →‎Grade systems for aid climbing: "New Wave" was never about clean, but about the "5+" or the "6" grade
• 22:1122:11, 11 October 2009 diff hist +1,003‎ Talk:Clean climbing ‎ →‎Edit revert: definition questionable? thats why it's encyclopedia - dictionaries can't do justice to a subject like this. It'd be like defining the political "left" or "right" globally
• 21:5921:59, 11 October 2009 diff hist +994‎ Talk:Clean climbing ‎ →‎Edit revert: OK, instead of continuing that, let's discuss
• 21:5021:50, 11 October 2009 diff hist +50‎ Vergonha ‎ →‎Constitutional issues: ok, that text actually was POV.
• 21:4821:48, 11 October 2009 diff hist +7‎ Vergonha ‎ →‎Constitutional issues: deemed by whom?
• 21:4621:46, 11 October 2009 diff hist −27‎ Vergonha ‎ Nobody is attempting to resolve POV matters. Nobody even claims they're real. Remove tag
• 21:4421:44, 11 October 2009 diff hist +196‎ Talk:Vergonha ‎ →‎Restored NPOV tag: what for? nobody did anything about it one way or the other. Even the discussion is equivocal.
• 21:4321:43, 11 October 2009 diff hist +11‎ Vergonha ‎ oops proper formatting preview next time
• 21:4221:42, 11 October 2009 diff hist +55‎ Vergonha ‎ ref's
• 21:3321:33, 11 October 2009 diff hist +234‎ Vergonha ‎No edit summary
• 21:2321:23, 11 October 2009 diff hist +22‎ Talk:Vergonha ‎ →‎Incomplete: new section
• 21:2221:22, 11 October 2009 diff hist +23‎ Vergonha ‎ Incompelte template tag added. See Talk:#Patois? Really?
• 21:1521:15, 11 October 2009 diff hist +1,524‎ Talk:Vergonha ‎ →‎Patois? Really?Or propaganda?: new section