User contributions for 70.247.167.99

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:4018:40, 7 August 2016 diff hist +9‎ Seven-dimensional cross product ‎ the mentioned relation is not specified, so this statement seems to beg the question
16:0916:09, 7 August 2016 diff hist +11‎ Quintessence (physics) ‎ degeneracy of what?
15:1215:12, 7 August 2016 diff hist +8‎ Superstring theory ‎ link more headings
14:0114:01, 7 August 2016 diff hist 0‎ Superstring theory ‎ link full question
13:5213:52, 7 August 2016 diff hist +32‎ String theory ‎ distinguish

15:3515:35, 4 August 2016 diff hist +15‎ Nuclear force ‎ accidental redlink
15:3215:32, 4 August 2016 diff hist +4‎ Nuclear force ‎ link to appropriate spin
15:2815:28, 4 August 2016 diff hist +11‎ Nuclear force ‎ isospin on proton and neutron pages are both listed as 1/2
15:1215:12, 4 August 2016 diff hist +23‎ Nuclear force ‎ description of nuclear binding
15:0315:03, 4 August 2016 diff hist +22‎ Nuclear force ‎ section is about field strength
15:0115:01, 4 August 2016 diff hist +32‎ Nuclear force ‎ hatnote potential confusion
14:5714:57, 4 August 2016 diff hist +2‎ Nuclear force ‎ decay is poor word choice here due to potential confusion with nuclear decay
14:2814:28, 4 August 2016 diff hist +1‎ Nuclear force ‎ move history to history section
11:3711:37, 4 August 2016 diff hist +49‎ Coleman–Mandula theorem ‎ add suppport
11:3011:30, 4 August 2016 diff hist +4‎ Coleman–Mandula theorem ‎ link
11:2811:28, 4 August 2016 diff hist −4‎ Coleman–Mandula theorem ‎ break out numbered conditions
03:3803:38, 4 August 2016 diff hist −13‎ Quantum contextuality ‎ simplify
02:3602:36, 4 August 2016 diff hist +49‎ Quantum number ‎ attempt to clarify
02:1102:11, 4 August 2016 diff hist +54‎ Triple product ‎ there is enough content here for two separate articles
01:5101:51, 4 August 2016 diff hist +38‎ Triple product ‎ also called triple scalar product

18:0118:01, 3 August 2016 diff hist +37‎ Quantum system ‎ add
17:2717:27, 3 August 2016 diff hist +211‎ Quantum number ‎ explain/repair earlier statement
17:0917:09, 3 August 2016 diff hist +53‎ Quantum number ‎ Context here doesn't warrant exclusivity of these quantum numbers; contextualize better
17:0417:04, 3 August 2016 diff hist −1‎ Quantum number ‎ remove extra
17:0317:03, 3 August 2016 diff hist +76‎ Quantum number ‎ add structure
16:5016:50, 3 August 2016 diff hist +25‎ Quantum number ‎ context here is that of a quantum system

16:3216:32, 2 August 2016 diff hist +48‎ Binary black hole ‎ break out life-cycle
16:2916:29, 2 August 2016 diff hist +9‎ Binary black hole ‎ the modeling here is of the system dynamics
16:2616:26, 2 August 2016 diff hist +24‎ Binary black hole ‎ the precision of the date is artificial, clarify the observer dependence
16:2016:20, 2 August 2016 diff hist −15‎ Binary black hole ‎ separation is shrinking

15:3715:37, 1 August 2016 diff hist +4‎ Anomaly (physics) ‎ link
14:2214:22, 1 August 2016 diff hist +17‎ Scattering amplitude ‎ move to measurement section
14:2114:21, 1 August 2016 diff hist +11‎ Scattering amplitude ‎ need clarification as to why low-energy is significant
14:1914:19, 1 August 2016 diff hist +4‎ Scattering amplitude ‎ no need to exclude other potential methods
14:1614:16, 1 August 2016 diff hist +7‎ Scattering amplitude ‎ unclear what these terms are qualifying
13:3513:35, 1 August 2016 diff hist +4‎ Relational quantum mechanics ‎ link
13:1613:16, 1 August 2016 diff hist +203‎ Talk:Quantum field theory ‎ →‎Comparison: new section
13:1213:12, 1 August 2016 diff hist +1‎ Quantum field theory ‎ move history to history section

21:0821:08, 4 July 2016 diff hist −1‎ Monodromy ‎ "best" is POV without supporting evidence