User contributions for 69.178.53.217

Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

22 November 2021

6 November 2021

11 October 2021

12 September 2021

8 September 2021

5 September 2021

17 June 2021

14 June 2021

11 June 2021

10 June 2021

8 June 2021

1 June 2021

  • 03:0303:03, 1 June 2021 diff hist −648 InuitRevert to original, updated sourcing: overreliance on a single transient source doesn't make sense in this context Tag: Reverted

29 May 2021

27 May 2021

24 May 2021

21 May 2021

13 May 2021

  • 09:0509:05, 13 May 2021 diff hist −139 Inuitcited source contains numerous inaccuracies, and does not support the statement which the citation it follows, which does not require citation Tag: references removed

5 May 2021

  • 03:3403:34, 5 May 2021 diff hist +176 EskimoLet people read the facts, and judge for themselves, instead of edit warring based on non-(NPOV)
  • 03:0703:07, 5 May 2021 diff hist −38 EskimoSource does not indicate that word is pejorative (nor that it is "seen as pejorative", which is actually just incorrect grammar). We have more accepted and less transient sources stating the opposite. "Colonialist", in this context, is not well-defined. The word is an exonym, and like a lot of exonyms, the people it refers to largely don't love it. The source claim that it "is a colonial name imposed by non-Indigenous people" is a leap, requiring etymologic corroboration. Tag: Manual revert

30 April 2021

  • 18:5518:55, 30 April 2021 diff hist +98 EskimoLinking Merriam-Webster source and statement in contrast to a source which is changing its statement every 6 months or so

27 April 2021

22 February 2021

4 February 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)