User contributions for 68.180.28.138
Appearance
For 68.180.28.138 talk block log logs filter log
29 April 2013
- 20:2420:24, 29 April 2013 diff hist −72 Kenilworth, Illinois No edit summary
- 00:1900:19, 29 April 2013 diff hist +324 Michael Allen (journalist) Undid revision 552615513 by SummerPhD (talk) Sourced with additional NYT article
28 April 2013
- 04:4404:44, 28 April 2013 diff hist +236 Michael Allen (journalist) Undid revision 552522154 by SummerPhD (talk) Sourced
- 03:1503:15, 28 April 2013 diff hist +127 Michael Allen (journalist) No edit summary
23 April 2013
- 00:4600:46, 23 April 2013 diff hist +290 Talk:1984 United States presidential election No edit summary
- 00:4400:44, 23 April 2013 diff hist +406 Talk:1984 United States presidential election No edit summary
22 April 2013
- 05:2005:20, 22 April 2013 diff hist +315 User talk:Inqvisitor No edit summary
- 00:2800:28, 22 April 2013 diff hist −3,674 Libertarian perspectives on abortion Undid revision 551548241 by Srich32977 (talk) Not a single source cites any numbers or hard data. You have a strange definition of strong. Please take it to the talk page.
- 00:1800:18, 22 April 2013 diff hist −3,674 Libertarian perspectives on abortion Undid revision 548424602 by Binksternet (talk) The point is that those citations aren't strong enough support for the claim.
20 April 2013
- 17:0317:03, 20 April 2013 diff hist −10 1984 United States presidential election Undid revision 551310735 by Inqvisitor (talk) No, that recovery continues to be controversial among many. It is a *fact* - not a perception - that Reagan touted both.
- 02:3902:39, 20 April 2013 diff hist −10 1984 United States presidential election Undid revision 550250091 by Inqvisitor (talk) You are clearly failing to understand. The sentence begins "Reagan touted". It is a fact that he touted this, Was the econ. recovery perceived too?
13 April 2013
- 23:2823:28, 13 April 2013 diff hist −10 1984 United States presidential election Undid revision 550101475 by Inqvisitor (talk) Yes, it is a fact - otherwise wouldn't have won 59% of vote (see source). Whether that revival in confidence was warranted is what's subjective.
12 April 2013
- 17:3017:30, 12 April 2013 diff hist −10 1984 United States presidential election Undid revision 548862408 by Inqvisitor (talk) "a revival of national confidence" is by definition a perception - perceived adds nothing
10 April 2013
- 19:4919:49, 10 April 2013 diff hist +11 Thanjavur No edit summary
3 April 2013
- 01:5101:51, 3 April 2013 diff hist −3,674 Libertarian perspectives on abortion The sources for saying "majority of libertarians support abortion" are all qualitative - none offer any objective, quantitative evidence.
20 March 2013
- 21:3421:34, 20 March 2013 diff hist 0 1984 United States presidential election No edit summary
- 21:3321:33, 20 March 2013 diff hist +139 1984 United States presidential election Undid revision 544692177 by Sunray (talk) added citation
- 20:0720:07, 20 March 2013 diff hist −732 Marco Rubio Rubio's connection to the Tea Party has gradually declined - "crown prince" designation is hardly accurate anymore.
- 08:2408:24, 20 March 2013 diff hist −445 Wharton School paragraph about Cornell comparison in the lede is unnecessary
17 March 2013
- 19:4719:47, 17 March 2013 diff hist −2 1980 United States presidential election No edit summary
16 March 2013
- 17:2017:20, 16 March 2013 diff hist +68 1984 United States presidential election No edit summary
13 March 2013
- 04:2904:29, 13 March 2013 diff hist −17 Mathura No edit summary
- 04:2704:27, 13 March 2013 diff hist −140 Thanjavur No edit summary