User contributions for 65.130.204.146
Appearance
For 65.130.204.146 talk block log logs global block log filter log
19 March 2015
- 04:5304:53, 19 March 2015 diff hist +532 User talk:Geraldo Perez/2015 Revision history →Not "vandalism.": new section
- 04:5204:52, 19 March 2015 diff hist +513 User talk:65.130.204.146 Not "vandalism."
- 04:4804:48, 19 March 2015 diff hist −14 Warner Bros. Television Studios How is it supposedly "disruptive" or "vandalist" to edit clarity into an article by changing an '''internal''' abbreviation such as "WBTV" so that it doesn't conflict with a TV station whose name is already that?
- 04:4504:45, 19 March 2015 diff hist +890 User talk:Bishonen →Getting attacked on my talk page again.
- 04:2804:28, 19 March 2015 diff hist −14 Warner Bros. Television Studios No edit summary
- 04:2404:24, 19 March 2015 diff hist −2 United Artists Television No edit summary
- 04:2204:22, 19 March 2015 diff hist −11 United Artists Television What's your rationale behind eliminating abbreviations that are already in an article if '''I''' add the one to the lead, while leaving in the ones that shadeed wrote? Are you on the side of shadeed's WP:OWNing, or something?
- 04:0104:01, 19 March 2015 diff hist +1 New Line Television Sounds fine, then.
- 03:5703:57, 19 March 2015 diff hist +1 NBCUniversal Media Group Sounds fine.
- 03:5603:56, 19 March 2015 diff hist +1 MGM Home Entertainment OK, that's fine.
- 03:5403:54, 19 March 2015 diff hist −27 Barry & Enright Productions Really, you '''want''' that messed-up template in there?