User contributions for 2604:2000:1109:A316:0:0:0:173

24 May 2020

• 15:0615:06, 24 May 2020 diff hist +66‎ Abomination of desolation ‎ The written gospels are transcriptions of the oral gospels which has been recorded in the oral tradition of the time from circa 30-33 AD to circa 70-90 AD.
• 01:5901:59, 24 May 2020 diff hist +521‎ User talk:Sundayclose ‎ →‎WHY ARE YOU ENGAGING IN A CHANGE WAR?: new section
• 00:5800:58, 24 May 2020 diff hist −1,006‎ Oral gospel traditions ‎ The quote is mere supposition presenting the inherent bias of Ehrman and the Wikipedia entry writer who included it. In no way does the quote remotely reveal the methodology of oral tradition analysis nor is it even remotely good scholarship in textual criticism. The quote is misleading and suggests that all oral tradition is error. A comparison with Wikipedia entries of other transmitted knowledge from oral tradition, e.g., Viking Sagas, lacks the same bias.
• 00:5200:52, 24 May 2020 diff hist +549‎ User talk:Sundayclose ‎ →‎I Have Noticed that You Have Messaged Me: new section

23 May 2020

• 20:1120:11, 23 May 2020 diff hist +4‎ Oral gospel traditions ‎ Scholars is a loaded term. It it implies correctness rather than those involved in study and conjecture.
• 20:0920:09, 23 May 2020 diff hist +30‎ Oral gospel traditions ‎ →‎Critical methods: source and form criticism
• 20:0820:08, 23 May 2020 diff hist −951‎ Oral gospel traditions ‎ Accuracy. Both scholar and modern are loaded terms of rhetoric that lead to misleading beliefs. The Ehrman telephone anecdote is an attempt at persuasion, reveals bias and fails to support how the actual oral tradition of that time works. Tag: references removed