User contributions for 24.23.44.136

18 February 2014

• 21:2621:26, 18 February 2014 diff hist −197‎ Jagger–Richards ‎ much more needs to be done, former spelling of Richards should be in body

16 February 2014

• 02:0202:02, 16 February 2014 diff hist +152‎ Talk:The Rolling Stones ‎ →‎Anglo/American commonality of "the band is" proven

12 February 2014

• 19:4719:47, 12 February 2014 diff hist +85‎ Talk:The Rolling Stones ‎ →‎Anglo/American commonality of "the band is" proven
• 19:4319:43, 12 February 2014 diff hist +54‎ Talk:The Rolling Stones ‎ →‎Anglo/American commonality of "the band is" proven

11 February 2014

• 23:4923:49, 11 February 2014 diff hist +858‎ Talk:The Rolling Stones ‎ →‎Anglo/American commonality of "the band is" proven: new section
• 21:5021:50, 11 February 2014 diff hist −1‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ Undid revision 594779883 by Bruce1ee (talk) Maybe the third times this has been said, "it he Band is" I is common in England, search the Times

4 February 2014

• 21:1221:12, 4 February 2014 diff hist +4‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ wiki link to chuck leavell added

31 January 2014

• 19:2319:23, 31 January 2014 diff hist +1‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ comma
• 19:2319:23, 31 January 2014 diff hist +14‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ tweak

21 January 2014

• 23:3623:36, 21 January 2014 diff hist +6‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ Nuance
• 23:3523:35, 21 January 2014 diff hist +12‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ Treak
• 23:3323:33, 21 January 2014 diff hist +54‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ It's remarkable that their longish hair has been made no note of

13 January 2014

• 22:3922:39, 13 January 2014 diff hist −31‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ prose

8 January 2014

• 23:0323:03, 8 January 2014 diff hist −7‎ Keith Richards ‎ →‎Guitarist: prose
• 23:0123:01, 8 January 2014 diff hist −28‎ Keith Richards ‎ →‎Bandleader: prose and Stew is dead

6 January 2014

• 20:0120:01, 6 January 2014 diff hist +456‎ Talk:The Rolling Stones ‎ →‎Flagging fortunes false narrative
• 19:5619:56, 6 January 2014 diff hist −3‎ Talk:The Rolling Stones ‎ →‎Rock, pop
• 19:5519:55, 6 January 2014 diff hist −2‎ Talk:The Rolling Stones ‎ →‎Rock, pop
• 19:5519:55, 6 January 2014 diff hist +79‎ Talk:The Rolling Stones ‎ →‎Rock, pop
• 19:3819:38, 6 January 2014 diff hist −374‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ to suggest that there has not been periods of no "friction" (think Keith's jones and Brian Jones toubles) and that their fortunes had flagged is false.
• 19:3619:36, 6 January 2014 diff hist +19‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ changing to the focus to primitive urban down ho,e blues is one of the Stones greatest musical acomplishments

3 January 2014

• 22:1822:18, 3 January 2014 diff hist −181‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ the last lede paragraph covers their recording success, which in fact continued regarding singles into the 80s
• 22:1622:16, 3 January 2014 diff hist −353‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ Satanic Majesties was a deviation not notable for the lead. The body is where their reception vis a vis the Beatles belongs. Goats Head, Only Rock n Roll and Black and Blue were not commercial failures as suggested
• 22:1222:12, 3 January 2014 diff hist 0‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ collaborator is too broad and vague, Jones is the bassist, and that is all that need be said
• 22:0922:09, 3 January 2014 diff hist −27‎ The Rolling Stones ‎ Mick Jagger has sung no John Lee Hooker songs with the Stones, his inclusion is too tangential since they were devoted to promoting Chicago Blues,