User contributions for 206.124.6.222

21 February 2010

• 08:2308:23, 21 February 2010 diff hist +47‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 08:1708:17, 21 February 2010 diff hist +96‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 08:1608:16, 21 February 2010 diff hist +209‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 08:1308:13, 21 February 2010 diff hist −2‎ Rachel Carson ‎ m - someone apparently accidentally reverted the change I made removing (POV) sarcasm quotes when they made some other change
• 01:5401:54, 21 February 2010 diff hist +154‎ User talk:Cronos1 ‎ →‎Rachel Carson
• 01:5201:52, 21 February 2010 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 01:5201:52, 21 February 2010 diff hist +222‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions

20 February 2010

• 22:1722:17, 20 February 2010 diff hist +687‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 21:3621:36, 20 February 2010 diff hist +422‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 21:3321:33, 20 February 2010 diff hist +623‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 21:2921:29, 20 February 2010 diff hist +334‎ Talk:Nolan Chart ‎ →‎Nonsensical
• 21:2621:26, 20 February 2010 diff hist +605‎ Talk:Nolan Chart ‎ →‎Biased towards American politics
• 21:1421:14, 20 February 2010 diff hist +1,037‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 21:0321:03, 20 February 2010 diff hist +724‎ User talk:Yilloslime ‎ →‎Rachel Carson: new section
• 20:5220:52, 20 February 2010 diff hist +559‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 20:4820:48, 20 February 2010 diff hist +44‎ Rachel Carson ‎ Once again, trying to pacify Carson-lovers, getting rid of the POV impression that critic is conservative. Trying yet another wording alternative.
• 20:4420:44, 20 February 2010 diff hist +213‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions
• 20:3720:37, 20 February 2010 diff hist +850‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Filtering or using ad hominem attacks of critical contributions: new section
• 20:2220:22, 20 February 2010 diff hist −1‎ User talk:Cronos1 ‎ →‎Rachel Carson
• 20:2220:22, 20 February 2010 diff hist +172‎ User talk:Cronos1 ‎ →‎Rachel Carson
• 18:2618:26, 20 February 2010 diff hist +26‎ User talk:Cronos1 ‎ →‎Rachel Carson
• 18:2518:25, 20 February 2010 diff hist +346‎ User talk:Cronos1 ‎ →‎Rachel Carson
• 18:1618:16, 20 February 2010 diff hist 0‎ Rachel Carson ‎ m - typo
• 18:1518:15, 20 February 2010 diff hist +304‎ Rachel Carson ‎ Re-added the Driessen reference, which was deleted without comment.
• 18:0718:07, 20 February 2010 diff hist −2‎ Rachel Carson ‎ sarcasm quotes have been replaced without comment, and are NPOV problem
• 18:0118:01, 20 February 2010 diff hist +305‎ User talk:Cronos1 ‎ →‎Rachel Carson
• 17:5917:59, 20 February 2010 diff hist +2‎ Rachel Carson ‎ m - more punctuation
• 17:5817:58, 20 February 2010 diff hist −4‎ Rachel Carson ‎ m - punctuation
• 17:5817:58, 20 February 2010 diff hist +104‎ Rachel Carson ‎ Once again, reworded differently, in such a way that does not make it look like the only criticism is from conservatives.
• 17:5517:55, 20 February 2010 diff hist +546‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Conservative criticism of Carson in Legacy section
• 17:5217:52, 20 February 2010 diff hist +1,001‎ User talk:Cronos1 ‎ →‎Rachel Carson: new section
• 10:1110:11, 20 February 2010 diff hist −13‎ Rachel Carson ‎ removed NPOV, unnecessary ad hominem attack on critics by labeling them all conservative, many of whom are NOT
• 10:0810:08, 20 February 2010 diff hist +467‎ Talk:Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Conservative criticism of Carson in Legacy section
• 09:5909:59, 20 February 2010 diff hist 0‎ Rachel Carson ‎ m - typo
• 09:5809:58, 20 February 2010 diff hist +308‎ Rachel Carson ‎ →‎Further reading
• 09:4409:44, 20 February 2010 diff hist +10‎ The Yes Men ‎ POV - sounds like violence. Youtube video shows that the encounter was playful
• 09:3909:39, 20 February 2010 diff hist +9‎ The Yes Men ‎ It was not paint, which was thrown on them, it was colored powder, and this can be verified on youtube.
• 09:2909:29, 20 February 2010 diff hist −2‎ Human Events ‎ replaced confusing definite article with better indefinite article
• 09:2809:28, 20 February 2010 diff hist −5‎ Human Events ‎ m - removed unnecessary and confusing extra word
• 09:2309:23, 20 February 2010 diff hist −2‎ Rachel Carson ‎ NPOV - removed sarcasm quotes
• 09:0909:09, 20 February 2010 diff hist +274‎ Talk:Silent Spring ‎ →‎"Criticisms"?
• 08:5808:58, 20 February 2010 diff hist +262‎ Talk:Silent Spring ‎ →‎"Criticisms"?
• 04:5104:51, 20 February 2010 diff hist +124‎ User talk:206.124.6.222 ‎No edit summary
• 04:5104:51, 20 February 2010 diff hist −6,060‎ User talk:206.124.6.222 ‎ →‎February 2010

12 February 2010

• 00:0200:02, 12 February 2010 diff hist −112‎ User talk:206.124.6.222 ‎ →‎February 2010
• 00:0100:01, 12 February 2010 diff hist +13‎ User talk:206.124.6.222 ‎ →‎February 2010
• 00:0000:00, 12 February 2010 diff hist +259‎ User talk:206.124.6.222 ‎ →‎February 2010

11 February 2010

• 23:4923:49, 11 February 2010 diff hist +60‎ User talk:206.124.6.222 ‎ →‎February 2010
• 23:4723:47, 11 February 2010 diff hist +419‎ User talk:206.124.6.222 ‎ →‎February 2010
• 23:3323:33, 11 February 2010 diff hist +151‎ User talk:206.124.6.222 ‎ →‎February 2010