User contributions for 203.192.236.183

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:3518:35, 25 February 2021 diff hist +416‎ User talk:Elspamo4 ‎ →‎About the years-old unmaintained article on Qatar's national broadcaster/broadcasting-authority: An[?] Addendum
18:2018:20, 25 February 2021 diff hist +12‎ Pegida ‎ MINOR: Wikilinked to the definition of "being Islamicised" with "EurArabia" conspiracy-theory Tag: Visual edit
15:5115:51, 25 February 2021 diff hist +3,245‎ User talk:Elspamo4 ‎ →‎About the years-old unmaintained article on Qatar's national broadcaster/broadcasting-authority: new section
13:3713:37, 25 February 2021 diff hist +104‎ Qatar Media Corporation ‎ Alright.. You personally-attacked me without giving me a chance to react fully explain. Okay. I'm gonna explain to you at the desired-place. So far.. I've partly-applied my edit here. Tag: Visual edit
13:1713:17, 25 February 2021 diff hist +744‎ Qatar Media Corporation ‎ Undid revision 1008792562 by Elspamo4 (talk): Part revd the edit as addition of a mere single source doesn't do anything. Moreover, it appears you couldn't revert the entirety of vandalism here — and that's why, it appears you were in rather bizzare-hurry to salvage this article about a discrete=non-notable subject. While I understand Wikipedia's oh-so-surprisingly startling-revelations on WP:WORLDVIEW as a non-stereotypical 'fIrSt... Tag: Reverted
05:1005:10, 25 February 2021 diff hist −6‎ China Global Television Network ‎ Removed OVERLINK &, also fixed the phrasing Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
05:0605:06, 25 February 2021 diff hist −655‎ China Global Television Network ‎ FIXED: Alright.. Given it's asked to open a talk-page bargaining merely for tagging, it would be far more productive if as a compromise: The claim that RWB has classified this as a "misinformation" and not US-based sources, without "Amigao" bothering to address USAGM's reliability for reporting on mainland-Chinese State, I changed the prose on top of prior improvements that arguably the only-reliable citation here, NYT's coverage for the same is conveyed in WP:WIKIVOICE, 🚫AGM Tags: references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

25 February 2021