User contributions for 202.159.191.219
Appearance
For 202.159.191.219 talk block log logs filter log
30 September 2017
- 19:0519:05, 30 September 2017 diff hist +389 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Koncorde reported by User:202.159.191.219 (Result: ): Koncorde's still kan't understand Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:3716:37, 30 September 2017 diff hist +559 User talk:Koncorde →You've violated 3rr: new section
- 16:3616:36, 30 September 2017 diff hist +918 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
- 16:2916:29, 30 September 2017 diff hist 0 Talk:Rapid transit →KONcorde's konfusion
- 16:2716:27, 30 September 2017 diff hist +2,533 Talk:Rapid transit →KONcorde's konfusion: new section
- 13:2513:25, 30 September 2017 diff hist +12 Rapid transit Neither example is exclusively monorail. Links to other articles are not a replacement for citations. If you don't understand what needs to be cited, why are you reverting? Sydney Monorail was a LOW-capacity line; maybe go read the article.
- 10:5610:56, 30 September 2017 diff hist +12 Rapid transit There are already ten citations in the lead. Down the page, "high capacity Monorails with larger and longer trains can be classified as rapid transit systems" is uncited.
- 08:3808:38, 30 September 2017 diff hist +6 Rapid transit Article scope and terminology requires clarification.
- 08:1708:17, 30 September 2017 diff hist +459 Sydney Metro Not high-capacity.
- 08:1208:12, 30 September 2017 diff hist +6 Rapid transit No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
29 September 2017
- 07:2707:27, 29 September 2017 diff hist +460 Sydney Metro Yes it is.