User contributions for 170.171.10.30
Appearance
For 170.171.10.30 talk block log logs global block log filter log
15 November 2013
- 15:4615:46, 15 November 2013 diff hist +17 Rock Bottom Remainders No edit summary
18 May 2012
- 20:3620:36, 18 May 2012 diff hist +69 White Lady →Philippines
24 August 2009
- 14:2914:29, 24 August 2009 diff hist −73 REST →Public implementations: Despite Twitter's marketing team, this is not REST, but just RPC. There is so much coupling between URI and resource in this API it can't be REST.
- 14:2714:27, 24 August 2009 diff hist 0 REST →RESTful web services: URL is a deprecated term. Use URI.
20 August 2009
- 14:5414:54, 20 August 2009 diff hist −100 REST Removed external link which is an inaccurate example of REST and not based on authoritative sources. It couples resources to URIs from the client perspective, which is RPC, NOT REST.
18 August 2009
- 15:4715:47, 18 August 2009 diff hist +149 REST →Guiding principles of a REST interface
- 15:4615:46, 18 August 2009 diff hist +191 REST →Guiding principles of a REST interface
- 15:3215:32, 18 August 2009 diff hist −123 REST →External links: removed link to article which has too much coupling between URIs and resources and seems to imply the client knows how to construct URIs, a violation of REST (this is just RPC)
- 15:2815:28, 18 August 2009 diff hist −244 REST →History: removed reference - this link doesn't seem to follow or discuss RESTful principles despite using the name. It discusses URI schemes and implies the client knows how to construct URIs Tag: references removed
- 15:1815:18, 18 August 2009 diff hist −285 REST →Public implementations: Added a great REST API example, and removed irrelevant information on WSDL Tag: references removed
- 15:1515:15, 18 August 2009 diff hist −60 REST →RESTful web services: DELETE and PUT are generally used - just not supported by HTML4 forms, but many REST clients are not using HTML4, and many APIs support these methods.
14 August 2009
- 14:4214:42, 14 August 2009 diff hist −82 REST →External links: removed for not discussing REST (just how HTTP works). Listen, the HTTP spec has been around longer than REST. REST isn't just using HTTP correctly.
- 14:4014:40, 14 August 2009 diff hist −161 REST →External links: despite the link's title, it only discusses the HTTP verbs and how URIs are constructed. This has nothing to do with REST, which does not care what a URI looks like.
13 August 2009
- 17:0017:00, 13 August 2009 diff hist +662 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →Too much removal??
- 16:5116:51, 13 August 2009 diff hist +746 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →Too much removal??
- 16:3716:37, 13 August 2009 diff hist +910 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →Too much removal??
11 August 2009
- 22:0322:03, 11 August 2009 diff hist +46 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →HTTP 200 or 404 on bad requests
- 22:0222:02, 11 August 2009 diff hist +156 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →Fielding frustrated about what APIs are called REST APIs
- 21:5921:59, 11 August 2009 diff hist +211 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →I do not get it
- 21:5721:57, 11 August 2009 diff hist +58 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →stateless client/server protocol principle
- 21:5621:56, 11 August 2009 diff hist +108 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →REST frameworks
7 August 2009
- 15:0815:08, 7 August 2009 diff hist −14,128 REST Undid revision 306428307 by 128.227.98.183 (talk) Redid removal of irrelevant and misleading sections.
31 July 2009
- 14:4214:42, 31 July 2009 diff hist +25 REST →Constraints
- 14:3114:31, 31 July 2009 diff hist −163 REST →Outside of the Web: Removed nonsense sentence. REST isn't about "documents"
- 14:3014:30, 31 July 2009 diff hist −201 REST →Modbus: I can't see how this is RESTful. It also included irrelevant details - supporting GET/PUT for ranges of resources really has little to do with REST, just a similarity with HTTP. Tag: section blanking
- 14:2714:27, 31 July 2009 diff hist −522 REST →Implementation: Really has nothing to do with REST, just HTTP, and is inaccurate - misusing HTTP is fine when it is a workaround for broken clients, according to Fielding. Tag: section blanking
30 July 2009
- 17:0717:07, 30 July 2009 diff hist +16 REST Too much coupling with web services and too little on the actual REST architecture and its constraints
- 17:0317:03, 30 July 2009 diff hist −108 REST →Constraints: Removed misleading reference to WWW. This section should be cleaned up to more accurately reflect the actual constraints in Fielding's dissertation
- 17:0117:01, 30 July 2009 diff hist −1,101 REST →SNMP: This sounds merely similar to HTTP, not REST. If it doesn't navigate resources through hypertext, and relies on state, there's absolutely nothing RESTful about it! Tag: section blanking
- 16:5916:59, 30 July 2009 diff hist −145 REST →Outside of the Web: Much of the web is NOT RESTful. "Nearly RESTful" is meaningless - if a constraint is violated, it's not REST, it's something else, RPC in many mistaken cases.
- 16:5716:57, 30 July 2009 diff hist −2,523 REST →RESTful web services: This is really inappropriate for this article. It just describes proper use of HTTP. REST doesn't necessarily have anything to do with CRUD or HTTP, so this is misleading. Tag: section blanking
- 16:5616:56, 30 July 2009 diff hist +166 REST →Principles
- 16:5316:53, 30 July 2009 diff hist +474 Talk:REST/Archive 4 No edit summary
- 16:4916:49, 30 July 2009 diff hist +3 REST →RESTful web services: Pretty URIs are misleading - it's a common misconception that REST demands humanized, nested URIs so that the client can logically modify them. That's a violation of REST.
- 16:4616:46, 30 July 2009 diff hist −232 REST →Implementation
- 16:3116:31, 30 July 2009 diff hist +164 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →URI/URL
- 16:2316:23, 30 July 2009 diff hist −9 Talk:REST/Archive 4 →Examples of REST: Flickr ain't rest
- 16:2116:21, 30 July 2009 diff hist −6 LogMeIn Hamachi stupid bolding
27 July 2009
- 14:1414:14, 27 July 2009 diff hist −368 REST →Public implementations: No such thing as "REST-like", there's just REST or not REST. RSS isn't necessarily RESTful. Blogs generally are not RESTful.
23 July 2009
- 15:4815:48, 23 July 2009 diff hist −464 REST →Implementation: Not a place to list frameworks that claim to support REST
- 15:4615:46, 23 July 2009 diff hist −3,115 REST →RESTful example: the World Wide Web: This really has nothing to do with REST. Just a superfluous description of web tech
22 July 2009
- 22:5122:51, 22 July 2009 diff hist −162 REST Superfluous
- 22:4922:49, 22 July 2009 diff hist −2,598 REST →REST versus RPC: Removed section because it's inacacurate. REST is a form of RPC, but not all RPC is REST. Too much detail about HTTP, which REST doesn't specify. Tag: section blanking
- 22:4822:48, 22 July 2009 diff hist +71 REST →RESTful web services
- 22:4722:47, 22 July 2009 diff hist −393 REST →RESTful web services: URI naming/construction conventions has nothing to do with REST. Clients should not know anything about URIs. They might as well be garbage
- 22:4522:45, 22 July 2009 diff hist −12 REST →RESTful equivalent: REST has nothing to do with HTTP. This section has some OK info, but not an accurate example.
- 22:4422:44, 22 July 2009 diff hist −366 REST →JavaBeans: REST has nothing to do with a GET/PUT CRUD model, so I removed this misinformation Tag: section blanking
- 22:4222:42, 22 July 2009 diff hist −516 REST →REST versus RPC: Removed an incorrect example. URIs cannot be hardcoded into the client like that if they are not entry points. That is just RPC.
- 22:3922:39, 22 July 2009 diff hist −820 REST Removed misleading content. Fielding himself says that there is no such thing as "lower/weaker REST" and so on, and it's false that most of the web can be considered RESTful Tag: references removed
- 22:3622:36, 22 July 2009 diff hist −12 REST →Public implementations: Flickr is not RESTful, according to Fielding