User contributions for 108.242.169.13

16 February 2016

• 03:0403:04, 16 February 2016 diff hist +629‎ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics ‎ I had to convince BenRG. Yay!

15 February 2016

• 19:2619:26, 15 February 2016 diff hist +475‎ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics ‎ I described the finished proof.

14 February 2016

• 18:3918:39, 14 February 2016 diff hist +5‎ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics ‎ small typo
• 18:3218:32, 14 February 2016 diff hist +1,228‎ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics ‎ →‎The number of solutions for Brocard's Problem is finite!: new section

12 February 2016

• 14:4814:48, 12 February 2016 diff hist +981‎ Talk:Brocard's problem ‎ just a conversation

13 December 2015

• 06:4106:41, 13 December 2015 diff hist +586‎ Talk:Van der Waerden number ‎ the formula must be noted.

20 November 2015

• 18:4818:48, 20 November 2015 diff hist +810‎ Talk:Coin problem ‎ finally, the closed form for n= 3.

7 November 2015

• 23:1323:13, 7 November 2015 diff hist −9,912‎ Talk:Langford pairing ‎ tried to correct my LaTeX errors; I may have to edit it again!

5 November 2015

• 18:1618:16, 5 November 2015 diff hist −19‎ Talk:Langford pairing ‎ tried to correct rendering
• 18:1418:14, 5 November 2015 diff hist +1,231‎ Talk:Langford pairing ‎ just wanted to show David

9 October 2015

• 17:2417:24, 9 October 2015 diff hist +766‎ Talk:Inscribed square problem ‎ ask a friend to take a look at our creation!
• 16:2516:25, 9 October 2015 diff hist −164‎ Talk:Inscribed square problem ‎ forgot my tildas
• 16:2316:23, 9 October 2015 diff hist +830‎ Talk:Inscribed square problem ‎ duality
• 07:0807:08, 9 October 2015 diff hist +1,842‎ Talk:Inscribed square problem ‎ final

8 October 2015

• 18:1318:13, 8 October 2015 diff hist +487‎ Talk:Inscribed square problem ‎ bet
• 18:0718:07, 8 October 2015 diff hist +245‎ Talk:Inscribed square problem ‎ trying to appeal to David
• 18:0018:00, 8 October 2015 diff hist +277‎ Talk:Inscribed square problem ‎ it would work for any
• 17:5317:53, 8 October 2015 diff hist +1,193‎ Talk:Inscribed square problem ‎ the answer
• 17:3017:30, 8 October 2015 diff hist +662‎ N Talk:Inscribed square problem ‎ proof of Toeplitz's Conjecture

24 May 2015

• 04:4904:49, 24 May 2015 diff hist +2,511‎ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics ‎ van der waerden numbers

23 May 2015

• 22:1622:16, 23 May 2015 diff hist +188‎ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics ‎ →‎(my) formula for normal Latin Squares
• 20:3320:33, 23 May 2015 diff hist +1,367‎ Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics ‎ →‎Latin Square: new section
• 17:4517:45, 23 May 2015 diff hist +400‎ Talk:Latin square ‎ →‎formula for computing total number of Latin Squares

2 May 2015

• 07:0607:06, 2 May 2015 diff hist +477‎ Talk:Brocard's problem ‎ →‎here's why n! +1 is equal to only 3 squares
• 06:5106:51, 2 May 2015 diff hist +698‎ User talk:108.242.169.13 ‎ i'm addressing a possible solution to this variety of numbers

1 May 2015

• 17:0417:04, 1 May 2015 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Brocard's problem ‎ had to add the square of the right side of the equation
• 17:0217:02, 1 May 2015 diff hist +953‎ Talk:Brocard's problem ‎ just an idea

30 April 2015

• 18:1818:18, 30 April 2015 diff hist +1,190‎ Talk:Van der Waerden number ‎ my guess

28 April 2015

• 17:0717:07, 28 April 2015 diff hist +769‎ Talk:Brocard's problem ‎ here's my solution; it's the only possible conclusion!

26 April 2015

• 05:2805:28, 26 April 2015 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Van der Waerden number ‎ →‎here's the formula for Van der Waerden Numbers: corrected k to k+1 length typo
• 05:2605:26, 26 April 2015 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Van der Waerden's theorem ‎ →‎here's the formula for Van der Waerden Numbers: corrected k to k+1 length typo
• 05:1705:17, 26 April 2015 diff hist +114‎ Talk:Van der Waerden's theorem ‎ →‎here's the formula for Van der Waerden Numbers
• 05:1605:16, 26 April 2015 diff hist +114‎ Talk:Van der Waerden number ‎ I just had to share my overwhelming conclusion
• 05:1405:14, 26 April 2015 diff hist +856‎ Talk:Van der Waerden number ‎ I just had to share my overwhelming conclusion
• 05:1305:13, 26 April 2015 diff hist +856‎ Talk:Van der Waerden's theorem ‎ I just had to share my overwhelming conclusion

9 April 2015

• 14:5114:51, 9 April 2015 diff hist −381‎ Talk:Waring's problem ‎ the formula is even simpler than previously imagined.

8 April 2015

• 18:5918:59, 8 April 2015 diff hist +961‎ Talk:Waring's problem ‎ here's the formulation that the waring problem must adhere to...

10 September 2014

• 19:1619:16, 10 September 2014 diff hist +29‎ Talk:Langford pairing ‎ I had to make minor corrections to my final solution. Bill

31 August 2014

• 22:0722:07, 31 August 2014 diff hist +86‎ Talk:Langford pairing ‎ inserted sequence of subtracted squares. thanks!
• 16:4316:43, 31 August 2014 diff hist −1,576‎ Talk:Langford pairing ‎ I finally found the explicit formula for Langford pairings.