Search results

Results 1 – 6 of 6
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

There is a page named "Saamco" on Wikipedia

  • [1996] UKHL 10 is a joined English contract law case (often referred to as "SAAMCO") on causation and remoteness of damage. It arose out of the property crash...
    13 KB (1,923 words) - 10:58, 15 January 2024
  • Thumbnail for English contract law
    causal connection between the breach and the consequence complained of. In Saamco v York Montague Ltd it was held a bank could not recover damages from property...
    199 KB (28,902 words) - 07:26, 8 May 2024
  • Thumbnail for Baker v Willoughby
    Golden Victory [2007] UKHL 12 Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] AC 421 Saamco v York Montague Ltd Jobling v Associated Dairies Ltd [1981] UKHL 8, [1981]...
    3 KB (371 words) - 13:32, 16 April 2023
  • Thumbnail for Deloitte & Touche v Livent Inc (Receiver of)
    the plaintiff. However, Livent's loss was reasonably foreseeable. The "SAAMCO principle" does not apply in the present case, as "the shareholders’ capacity...
    23 KB (2,835 words) - 12:58, 14 July 2019
  • Barton, fourth edition 2008, Tottel Publishing; ISBN 978-1-84766-075-6.] (SAAMCO) [1997] AC 191, 214 England and Wales High Court (Queen's Bench Division)...
    19 KB (2,801 words) - 14:03, 22 December 2023
  • Thumbnail for Haugesund Kommune v DEPFA ACS Bank
    was of category 1 or category 2 under the Saamco principle)", before adding "[a]pplications of the Saamco principle will always be heavily fact sensitive...
    23 KB (3,116 words) - 08:11, 12 June 2023