Category talk:Low-importance Women scientists articles

This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This category is supported by the science and academia work group. Women scientists This category is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles

It's well established that women scientists tend to have shorter articles than men with similar achievements, yet I can't find a "low-importance Male scientists" lists. Why would this even be a category? Are any scientists low importance? Why would we split men from women? 79.225.186.133 (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very good question, I asked myself that. Really just another example of a sexist Wikipedia. Suspekt (talk) 11:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Case in point: Katalin Karikó just received the Nobel Prize. Here she is still categorized as low importance. Simply ridiculous. Suspekt (talk) 11:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]