Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/include/custom.css" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/include/custom.css" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system...94 KB (12,827 words) - 06:37, 4 February 2023
- however, is about user CSS, which is a topic that might be better to be covered elsewhere altogether. Perhaps the "Customizing how you see your signature"...52 KB (8,172 words) - 00:15, 5 September 2021
- 15:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC) I frequently call on Wikiproject expertise (in this instance, WT:WikiProject Turkey) for assistance in cases like this. Also...125 KB (16,779 words) - 06:25, 14 March 2023
- this Wikiproject. Absolutely no activity for the past one and half years. Articles related to orissa are anyway covered in Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion...221 KB (26,982 words) - 17:39, 26 July 2024
- java script or taking the css out of the page, but we have more fundamental problems that need to be sorted before custom signatures should be removed...156 KB (19,791 words) - 09:39, 10 October 2023
- {{WikiProject Portals}} on the talk page. The indicator on the portal page will not be visible by default, and will be hidden behind a custom CSS rule...157 KB (15,962 words) - 19:03, 8 May 2022
- within templates. When that comes into general use, Wikiproject members will be able to add a custom search to their pages that will find all submitted...350 KB (50,921 words) - 15:18, 30 May 2022
- all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes...69 KB (9,864 words) - 15:55, 10 July 2024
- That also should count towards editor retention.. and might serve to encourage a few anonymous editors into joining the wiki-community and Milhist. Ma®©usBritish{chat}...121 KB (18,512 words) - 09:33, 4 July 2024
- {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and inherited by the wikiproject banners. However, wikiprojects that prefer to use custom approaches to quality assessment can continue...250 KB (31,296 words) - 03:17, 4 January 2024
- simply archiving? A much more worthy project goal to include at the top level is "Review and refine wikiproject processes". --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:31,...300 KB (42,481 words) - 15:18, 30 May 2022
- screen size, or that it is irrelevant to the goal of increasing new editor retention? - J-Mo Talk to Me Email Me 00:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC) Well, to answer...73 KB (10,315 words) - 12:24, 3 April 2023
- but successful projects, e.g: • Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film • Tech projects/Tools, which may...501 KB (63,266 words) - 11:01, 3 April 2023
- written a message to that effect in the custom reason section. It generally seems to work in prompting the editor to either address the concerns, or stop...291 KB (38,589 words) - 09:40, 3 April 2023
- be in its own page. (This is how we decided to do it at MediaWiki wiki.) Either the CSS will need to be loaded from that page (I see no reason mw.loader...199 KB (23,262 words) - 04:00, 31 January 2023
- in Brazil, a sizable majority of editors consider editor retention the most important issue facing Wikimedia wikis at the moment. More often that not...153 KB (21,248 words) - 19:29, 23 July 2023
- registered users do actually find the visual editor easier to use, and it may be only 5% but we want to improve retention rates, do we not? In any case, if we...124 KB (19,273 words) - 01:10, 23 April 2022
- and editor retention) would outweigh its costs (mainly in freedom of expression, though this is really minor given that colorful and creative custom sigs...145 KB (19,523 words) - 00:13, 7 October 2022
- misconduct, a topic of discussion being raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention. Biosthmors (talk) 22:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the...272 KB (38,429 words) - 08:55, 21 April 2023
- point they need to show that either people like the editor, or that it's improving editor retention; and while it might do better than it's doing now,...109 KB (15,622 words) - 14:06, 28 January 2023
- Stbalbachabove. Annotations will be original writings by the editors and will inevitably include an element of original research. We already have rules about