Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia_talk:peer review include navigations
The page "Wikipedia talk:Peer review/include/navigation.js" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:Peer review/include/navigation.js" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- of code to include it in your js and be updatable, etc. User:Quarl/monobook.js uses a similar thing inside a function to keep his monobook.js very clean:...49 KB (6,982 words) - 15:37, 5 October 2021
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript/Archive 1 (section User script: User:The Transhumanist/anno.js)10:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC) I think it's more of a software peer review: a type of code review where the author invites other coders to assess a new or changed...83 KB (11,347 words) - 19:59, 11 October 2022
- detailed Peer Review, which is technically supposed to be found within the project itself. Actually, honestly, if more projects had Peer Review, there would...85 KB (13,540 words) - 11:52, 4 February 2023
- Currently, only navigation popups and InstaView are enabled. Howver, there are a lot more scripts, which aren't working. Please look at my monobook.js and then...77 KB (10,325 words) - 01:05, 23 April 2022
- For example, if I want to change Common.js or Common.css, I can do that without any discussion or code review, and it will affect lots of people when...58 KB (8,528 words) - 14:42, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 72 (section Peer Review for Blackwater Worldwide, please help!)following a peer review and a successful A-Class review. Comments appreciated. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC) The peer review for Special...52 KB (6,930 words) - 09:31, 4 July 2024
- hoping we can have here. As GAs and FAs are some what peer reviewed to keep them sort of peer reviewed requires a system like PC. Now as not everyone is convinced...270 KB (33,044 words) - 15:38, 30 May 2022
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force/Archive 2 (section Peer review for HMAS Melbourne (R21) now open)The peer review for HMAS Melbourne (R21) is now open; all editors are invited to participate, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks! Kirill...117 KB (17,477 words) - 02:50, 16 December 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 89 (section Peer review for Background of the Winter War now open)August 2009 (UTC) The article Arms industry is up for peer review in the main Wikipedia peer review page, any input anyone could provide there would be...252 KB (32,651 words) - 09:31, 4 July 2024
- your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of...70 KB (9,453 words) - 16:19, 15 April 2023
- A-review and peer-review, I'm not sure we really have an A-review all up and running yet, so I would suggest peer-review. However, since peer-review is...200 KB (25,758 words) - 21:39, 25 May 2022
- project I felt it would be a good idea to invite you guys to the party! :) ---J.S (t|c) 20:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC) I'm a bit confused. In my 1301 history...40 KB (6,128 words) - 23:13, 15 December 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 140 (section Template:Video game reviews in multiplatform mode with reviews for multiple platforms)needs to be included over at User talk:Evad37/Covery.js, I'm sure they can expand the script to include platform information (at least optionally). Regards...247 KB (31,849 words) - 02:49, 21 October 2018
- project should include this option for editors. I see no problem with having separate peer review and holding area sections. Peer review to build up an...103 KB (11,764 words) - 23:11, 21 August 2023
- Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Archive 47 (section Review-of-reviews needed after NPR removed for copyvio)User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js for marking page as reviewed and I want to know that is there is another tool for marking any page as reviewed....201 KB (25,529 words) - 06:42, 14 April 2023
- long time...User:Tim Song/afchelper4.js is out. Built from User:Tim Song/afchelper3.js, it adds support for reviewing WP:AFC/R submissions. To install the...215 KB (29,907 words) - 18:56, 8 May 2022
- needs altering, so that by adding the "on review" field, a subpage is immediately created (see MilHist peer review for example). In the meantime, how about...410 KB (57,878 words) - 16:18, 3 February 2024
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Archive 34 (section Technical review needed for Immunologist bio at WP:AFC)on a subset of open-access publishers which employ dubious methods of peer review, questionable handling of editorial-board duties, and predatory financial...256 KB (35,093 words) - 15:20, 16 February 2023
- it. -- Ganeshk (talk) 02:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC) I added peer-review and old-peer-review fields per the above section. Cbrown1023 02:26, 6 November...127 KB (19,284 words) - 09:57, 4 February 2023
- sources about someone asking them... The article has now a peer review (Wikipedia:Peer review/Meshuggah/archive2) before I'll go to FAC. Comments are welcome...203 KB (29,822 words) - 15:49, 10 March 2023
- many ways, editing, researching, annotating, and do that under the review of peers, using the guidelines, and adhering to the policies of those sites