Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lithuania

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Lithuania and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Shortcut WT:LITHUANIA

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Lithuania This page is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles

Archives

2006–2007 2008–2015 2015–

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

New topic - new section please. It would be much easier to communicate and not mix things.

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Juozapas Albinas Herbačiauskas#Requested move 24 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the 2001 subdivision of Kaunas, it has thee levels of subdivision:

Seniūnija -> Miesto dalys -> Miesto teritorijos

I noticed that various people at various times translated these terms variously, e.g., Seniūnija was either eldership or elderate, and don't even want to enumerate how 'dalys' and 'teritorija' were translated. Not to say about confusing interwikilinks of elderates vs 'dalys' which have the same name.

I'd like to unify the translations across Wikipedia. What will be the consensus about translations? - Altenmann >talk 22:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Partition of Poland has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]