Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Chemicals and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | WikiProject Chemicals was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 15 October 2012. |
Archives: | |
A-list discussions · 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Requested move for Alpha hydroxy acid
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/40px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has requested for Alpha hydroxy acid to be moved to another page. Since you had some involvement with Alpha hydroxy acid, you might want to participate in the move discussion (if you have not already done so).
Category:Trinitrotoluene has been nominated for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Trinitrotoluene has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Olympiadane
If anyone is looking to get a WP:DYK under their belt, then may I present to you Olympiadane. It needs work but it could be gotten ready in time for the Paris Olympics Project Osprey (talk) 09:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
MOS:MAINISOTOPE
What's the status of the discussion on MOS:MAINISOTOPE? It got archived without any box closing it. In [1] I assumed the discussion was inconclusive. 184.147.229.55 (talk) 08:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Looking for something to do? Try PFAS
As many know, C6-C10 perfluorinated carboxylic acids and sulfonic acids are in the news. They are "everywhere chemicals". One can be sure that these articles are consulted often. Here is the hierarchy of that set of articles (people are welcome to edit this list).
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances 158 kbyte (241 refs)
- Perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids 7.6
- Perfluoropropionic acid 4.8
- Perfluorobutanoic acid 5.6
- Perfluorooctanoic acid 129
- Perfluorononanoic acid 18
- Perfluorodecanoic acid 25
- FRD-903 5.7 (a branched PFAS)
- Perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids 7.6
- Perfluorosulfonic acids 4.6
- Perfluoropropanesulfonic acid 2
- Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid 9
- Nonaflate 1 (perfluorobutanesulfonate)
- Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 19
- Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid 54
- Perfluoro(4-ethylcyclohexane)sulfonic acid 3
- Perfluorosulfonic acids 4.6
These articles cover semi-complicated chemistry plus extensive health claims plus regulatory issues (often too US-focused, it seems) plus a dash of scare talk. A core issue is that PFAS might be everywhere, but in very low concentrations, and toxicity vs concentration correlations are challenging.
One also can imagine that many of these articles are an accretion of years of editing with no chopping. Maybe somehow we should try to shunt readers to PFAS, the master and make the others just simple discussions of the basic chem of that compound (kinda straightforward). My point is that PFAS would benefit from some serious editing. To some extent the article is overwhelmed with references, which might detract. --Smokefoot (talk) 21:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely a topic worthy of improvement, but it's a big job. Even the main PFAS article isn't in great shape (to my eyes at least) - for a page about chemicals there's little discussion of the chemistry: how it's made, or what it goes into, or why. The use of PFAS as a processing aid in blown film extrusion isn't mentioned at all, despite that often being a food contact material. Structure searching shows that we have 637 pages with a -CF2- group, 532 with -CF3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Project Osprey (talk • contribs)
- While I agree that some of these articles would merit improvements including shortening and better refs (e.g. Perfluorodecanoic acid), I strongly oppose the proposal. While PFASs share some common properties, such as the persistence of the perfluoroalkyl moiety, the universe of PFASs spans from gases to polymers, from surfactants to plant protection products and pharmaceuticals. They are also very different in terms of regulatory, health and environmental aspects. Would you also propose a similar strategy for alkanes, alcohols or PAHs?
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances can provide an overview also on regulatory, health or environmental aspects, but substance-specific information need to be kept in the individual articles.
- BTW: Here and here you propose to "proposed to be stripped of most regulatory, health, environmental aspects". However, several of the listed chemicals (e.g. Perfluoropropanesulfonic acid, Perfluoropropionic acid, ) do contain no or little such information. --Leyo 23:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I was thinking of a process aimed at helping readers by unifying info into a reliable source. My impression is that the main public concerns for "everywhere chemicals" are not about gases or polymers. My impression also is that the persistence and regulatory issues mainly pertain to C8-ish carboxylic acids and sulfonic acids. But have it your way, dude. Status quo.--Smokefoot (talk) 02:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Dark mode
B/W structural formulas are hardly visible in the dark mode, e.g. in Propane. Is this issue only with me? 162.23.30.48 (talk) 08:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- No, it's everywhere. I can't see a simple site wide solution, other than switching back to light mode. --Project Osprey (talk) 09:26, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/99/PropaneFull.png/220px-PropaneFull.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/99/PropaneFull.png/220px-PropaneFull.png)
- "class=skin-invert-image" could help => test using dark mode 162.23.30.48 (talk) 10:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like some infobox images with transparent background get automatic white background but others do not. In propane, the skeletal is fine but the other three are not. In that infobox, it's a difference of SVG (handled reasonably: skeletal) vs PNG (bad result: explicit, ball&stick, vdW). But it seems neither specific to chembox nor generally differential for these file-formats. At glucose, some PNG with transparent-bg in other article sections look good and others bad. Caveat: I'm using
?withgadget=dark-mode
to test based on the gadget using a non-darkmode browser, not the 'real' dark-mode. DMacks (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)- The issue might be resolved by adding "class=skin-invert-image" to Template:Chembox. 162.23.30.48 (talk) 10:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like some infobox images with transparent background get automatic white background but others do not. In propane, the skeletal is fine but the other three are not. In that infobox, it's a difference of SVG (handled reasonably: skeletal) vs PNG (bad result: explicit, ball&stick, vdW). But it seems neither specific to chembox nor generally differential for these file-formats. At glucose, some PNG with transparent-bg in other article sections look good and others bad. Caveat: I'm using
- "class=skin-invert-image" could help => test using dark mode 162.23.30.48 (talk) 10:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I guess if your not a chemist...CDCl3 doesnt work
@Solomonfromfinland: We chemists call deuterated chloroform CDCl3. So do the journals we publish in German, British, US, Canadian. Just saying. --Smokefoot (talk) 18:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I reverted the edits. Even under a legalistic reading of the Red Book, it is clearly stated that D and T for deuterium and tritium "may be" used. Double sharp (talk) 05:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)