The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I make no comment on the content of the article. I came across it while assessing articles and it had A-class status from other WP projects so I wanted to put it through our process to see if it held up.--Looper5920 10:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The sections on the Battle of Svolder and the Battle of Hjörungavágr are completely uncited, but other than that, it seems like a worthy candidate. If those sections were cited, I would change to support. Carom 18:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with Carom re: the two battle sections. Also the prose could use some minor tweaking and I'll be happy to help with that. Briangotts(Talk)(Contrib) 18:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SupportThere is definitely enough content, and it seems to be well formatted. I support, because the preceding criteria mean alot to me. ---ÅñôñÿMôúsDîššíd3nt 23:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with the comments above, the two battle section need cits and I would like to see a bigger lead if possible. Kyriakos 00:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
