Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink

Deletion Sorting Project
(talk) Project page Lists (by ABC) Lists (by topic) Lists (computer-readable) AfD: Today, Yesterday Delsort scripts
v t e

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Food and drink. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Food and drink|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Food and drink. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink/archive

Points of interest related to Food and drink on Wikipedia: Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do

Points of interest related to Food on Wikipedia: Portal – Category – WikiProject – Stubs – To-do

Points of interest related to Beer on Wikipedia: History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Cleanup – Assessment – To-do

Points of interest related to Soft drinks on Wikipedia: Category – WikiProject – Assessment – To-do

Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article is not WP:Notable. It seems to have gotten sparing citations in law journals (though far less often than it did nearly 100 years ago) and it seems like it's sometime taught in law schools (though I certainly don't remember learning about it) but that's it. The format is also very much not the standard for court cases on Wikipedia. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 02:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 02:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Covered briefly under various tort law books in Gbooks and Scholar, but most are snippets and only briefly mention this. I don't see notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This seems notable in law. Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co. is related to this case and links two articles comparing the two. The original author, Agradman, wrote on the talk page, "This case (ash v. childs) was very important about determining whether injuries like this needed to be resolved in tort versus contract." I think there is probably going to be coverage in some legal textbooks somewhere because searching for "Ash v. Childs" gets a lot of hits for study guides and homework help. The page is formatted like it's straight from someone's class notes, but the subject seems to be mentioned and discussed enough to be notable. A quick search turns up:

1. A big focus of: 24 Tul. L. Rev. 66 (1949-1950) Theory of a Case in Louisiana
2. One paragraph comparison: The Progress of the Law, 1918-1919 Civil Procedure (1919)
3. One paragraph: [The Theory of the Pleadings in Code States (1922)
4. One paragraph: The Law in Business Problems (1921)
5. One paragraph: TORTS - NEGLIGENCE - RES IPSA LOQUITUR AS APPLIED TO FOREIGN MATTER IN FOODS FOREIGN MATTER IN FOODS (1932)
6. A paragraph in a note: A Note on the Civil Remedies of Injured Consumers (1933)
7. Discussed in: Sales: Liability for the Presence of Mice and Other Uncommon Things in FoodThings in Food (1919)
8. Mentioned and cited: Sales. Warranties. Implied Warranty by Restaurateur of Wholesomeness of Food (1919)
9. Cite in footnotes: Implied Warranties of Wholesomeness again (1920)
10. Cited in footnote: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/molr31&div=25&id=&page=
11. Cited in footnotes: A Note on the Civil Remedies of Injured Consumers (1933)
12. Cited in footnote: Res Ipsa Loquitur: Its Nature and Effect (1935)
13. Cited in footnote: What is "Fit to Eat" -- The Reasonable Expectation Test (1968)

Also, would someone notify Wikipedia:WikiProject Law? I don't want to come off as canvassing since I'm writing a !vote. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 02:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Satisfies GNG with significant coverage in books and periodicals in Google Books, Google Scholar and elsewhere. There is a body of literature on the law relating to "unwholesome" food (as some if the sources call it). That is the parent topic of which this decision is an indispensible part. James500 (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per James500 and Wcquidditch, and WP:HEY, although I would prefer that someone add in the citations found to the article. Bearian (talk) 03:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I'll do some research on this tonight and tomorrow afternoon. I've found some things just need a little time to put it together. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hani Al-Mazeedi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see that the person meets the notability criteria; I couldn't find reliable sources that talk about him.-- فيصل (talk) 16:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Kuwait. فيصل (talk) 16:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Science. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Doesn't qualify for soft-deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete can't find sources in English to meet WP:BIO. I would reconsider if there are sources in Arabic but there's no Arabic version of this article. LibStar (talk) 05:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verwurelter

Purge server cache