The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 05:24, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Personal theory, not encyclopedic. Can't verify information in article. Article is biased or has lots of POV. 68.218.17.9 04:41, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete OR, one guy's theory, NOT an interpretation supported by NASA, I believe. --Etacar11 01:55, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, violates WP:NOR. I thought I'd see this before... Alphaxτεχ 03:09, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable pseudoscience. Sdedeo 15:56, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Original unsubstantiated 'research'. Not notable RoboJesus 07:25, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Possible hoax. Zeimusu | (Talk page) 04:11, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
