Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Treatise of the Great Seth

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transwiki to Wikisource. Will submit article to transwiki queue. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:02, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Second Treatise of the Great Seth

Delete or maybe wikisource? Copy-paste text widely available but not {{copyvio}} since well outside copyright. By way of being open: I originally marked this as copyvio but that was overzealous - the author got quite upset with me and reported me to vandalism in progress, but that was quashed very quickly and I apologised for my overzealocity(sic). The same applies to The Devil's Walk, which I just VfD'd.-Splash 21:34, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

My vote is ban Splash for being incompetent and Splash should have any powers given to him by Wiki taken away as he has proven he cannot handle them due to incompetence and child like behaviour WritersCramp 17:10, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You really should stop the personal attacks now. Also see this project's talk page for the other part of WritersCramp's comments. -Splash 18:02, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

Move to Wikisource there is nothing encyclopedic currentlyin the article (though there probably could easily be if someone actually wrote it). ~~~~ 2 July 2005 08:08 (UTC)

Take a hike Splash your a jerk and you know it. The Second Treatise was written in 200AD and was translated into English before 50 years ago so it is not copyright protected. You only confirm your ignorance by these cheap tactics. You should be banned or at the very least have any powers given to you by the Wiki stripped !!

Please keep this entry. I note it is very valuable to have source material within Wikipedia, even if not yet in the form of a formal entry. I hope this treatise will remain.

Delete, doesn't belong here. Paul 05:20, 14 August 2005 (UTC) Delete or transwiki. / Peter ^Isotalo 22:31, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.