Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percussive maintenance

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (already transwikied). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:41, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Partial VfD, didn't see where it originated. Article is currently flagged for transwiki. Abstain. Radiant_* 17:39, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

• Transwiki and probably merge to an article on maintenance of electronics; this is a widely-used term, though it's tongue-in-cheek. But I doubt it has potential to become encyclopedic enough for its own article. Barno 18:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki to Wiktionary and delete. --Carnildo 19:35, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• "If you can't fix it with a hammer, it's really broken." Soundguy99 14:23, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • In NASCAR Nextel Cup auto racing, teams which spend $15 million a year on shops and precision machine tools and computer-controlled test equipment and the best engineers still rely on a sledgehammer and a baseball bat when a wreck knocks a fender against a tire. Barno 16:27, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki to wiktionary and delete. →Iñgōlemo← ^talk 04:58, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
• Just transwikied for you. --Dmcdevit 23:35, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki and merge with an electronics per Barno. This was actually my article before I started wondering if it really belonged in Wiktionary, so I flagged it as a tranwiki candidate to gauge opinion. Jamyskis 07:45, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.