Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirkegaard Associates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - kept

Kirkegaard Associates

Advertisement, content is one line description with external link. -- Paul Richter 02:52, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Delete, speedied. --fvw* 03:38, 2004 Nov 26 (UTC)
  • Did you delete this dispite the fact its still on going and people are voting to keep it? This is an abuse of an administrator's power and I seriously think arbritration should be in order. --ShaunMacPherson 07:39, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep I don't see any real article here yet, but this is the most important firm/name in room acoustics design worldwide. They have been acoustical consultants in most of the important concert halls built in North America and Europe in the past two decades or longer. Surely they deserve to have an article here. Servais 04:37, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep I agree with Servais. The firm is notable and should have an entry. Apparently it remains to be written. Dystopos 00:55, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep I agree with servais, although it is hard to judge for myself since the artice was DELETED.--ShaunMacPherson 07:39, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep substub on one of the most important acoustic consultant firms over the past 2 decades. --[[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 23:19, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. They may or may not be important. But surely there are limits to what subsubsubsstubs we keep? If anybody adds three lines, showing some notability without making it an advertisement then I'll change my vote to keep. Until then, please remove it. Sander123 13:14, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Comments

Why is this article deleted? Votes are still ongoing, someone seems to be speedy deleting articles in opposition to the rules here. --ShaunMacPherson 07:39, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.