Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial Courts

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (no consensus), slight majority to keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Courts

Delete. Individual housing areas are not notable. This particular one gets about 550 Googles, for "Imperial Courts" "Los Angeles", a large number of which are irrelevant. -Splash 03:03, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, speedy if possible. This "article" has so little content or context that it is beyond 'non-notable'. AlbertR 03:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Even though it's been cleaned up, it's still not notable, and my vote stands. AlbertR 18:12, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Public housing projects are notable. This one is 50+ years old and was a filming location for Training Day. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:01, 2005 August 13 (UTC)
• Keep as above. real place, real people, community of yadda yadda yadda. Grutness...wha? 13:10, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Public housing projects are ten-a-penny on this side of the Atlantic. Most of them are about as NN as this one appears to be. --Marcus22 14:13, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • or, in my case, "...of the Pacific" Grutness...wha?
• Keep Real place with real community of interest and at least one claim to fame. Capitalistroadster 14:31, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Real place, valid footnote status, could stand to be expanded with history, etc. Hooper_X

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.