Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocaine use in Brasil

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:54, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cocaine use in Brasil

Unexpandable stub consisting of one datum and a bunch of unsourced speculation. --jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 04:28, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources on the talk page did you check themWiki brah 04:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; Specifying topics like this is not practical and would on a larger scale make searches in the database difficult. Merge with Cocaine or Brazil - or make an article about the drug use in various countries - not just Brazil. | Celcius 05:14, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - May account for the rampant anal sex there. Note to self: Visit Brazil. -PlainSight 05:28, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, opens the door to too many subarticles on the use of every drug in every country in the world. Zoe 05:36, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
Vote changed to Keep. I'm not worried about these articles on every drug in the world if there is something factual and verifiable to say about it, there might well be, but this article doesn't contain it as it stands. Trollderella 06:46, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Like i said before i have two sources on the article talk page one is from the O.A.S. and one is from the Washington Post what more do you want thank you Wiki_brah (talk · contribs)

Actually, this may well develop into an interesting article - cocaine use in Brazil is obviously rampant. I would suggest renaming it to Cocaine in Brazil, or perhaps something broader on illicit drug trade and use in Brazil, but with a bit more referencing, and some cleanup, this could be a good article. Trollderella 07:46, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Brazil or Cocaine until such time there's enough material for a seperate entry. This is too granular for such a seperate entry at the present time. (BTW, if an article is as short as this, you need to wikify Brazil only once.) - Mgm|^(talk) 09:40, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
Delete and give author a crash course in logic and proofs : More unverifiable or unproven hypotheses. I am however inspired by this article to write more like Causes of low usage of Dildos in Indian households. Manik Raina 12:02, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- An article on Causes of low usage of dildos in Texas households might actually have some content, since dildos are illegal there. Note: NOT an invitation to create the article. --Calton | Talk 12:47, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

I had a crack at it anyway, since I think it's a legitimate topic. Let me know what you think. Trollderella 15:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From the editor who brought you Template:Hot Jewish Actress-stub and Template:Scarface-stub. Delete. --Calton | Talk 12:47, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, stupid. Proto t c 14:20, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. Dottore So 18:39, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. DEng 19:54, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above Groeck 06:36, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, for above reasons. --Bhadani 15:56, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Nandesuka 22:41, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as speculative and probably not uniquely notable. ESkog 23:00, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. *drew 23:00, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. -- DS1953 01:08, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. MWOT. Andrewa 00:38, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.