Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 July 4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Kept.  Freely licensed, of possible future value.  Transfer to commons is, of course, possible. WilyD 13:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jessie_Coleman_in_2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xscapefilms (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Jessie Coleman was deleted following this AfD; it is very conceivable that her notability will increase (or inclusion standards will relax) within a fewer years resulting in recreation. And there is really nothing unencyclopedic about the image; please stop throwing the term around so loosely. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 11:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the article was deleted for her being non-notable (i.e. unencyclopedic) then it is safe to say her image is unencyclopedic also. -Nv8200p talk 02:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Most images we have aren't the immediate subjects of any currently existing articles; are they all unencyclopedic? Your use of the term seems nonstandard. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 09:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I think since it's a very nice image and with a good license it's very possible it will be useable in the future. I'd hate to delete it and then have us need it soon and be unable to reobtain. Maybe put it up on WikiCommons? Vickser (talk) 21:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure that I buy that the uploader is the copyright holder, but if someone thinks the image will stick on Commons, I'll support moving it. -Nv8200p talk 02:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Kept.  Now in use. WilyD 14:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jeton_kelmendi_1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Letrat (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Added to Kelmendi#Jeton_Kelmendi. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 11:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a free image that's no longer orphaned. Vickser (talk) 21:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  I don't think I need to explain. WilyD 14:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jewgleit1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Firefoxobsession (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an orphan that I can't possibly see any good use for. Vickser (talk) 21:08, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Deleted, no source provided to make tag verifiable —Angr 12:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jeyaraj1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bhanukaf (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I've added it to the guy's biography. WilyD 14:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, nobody cares. WilyD 14:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jhlogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jasenhudson (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, nobody wants it. WilyD 14:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jhs-email.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Harmonist (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, nobody seems to want it. WilyD 14:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jig_Halloween_2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Whitney1110 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Kept.  No longer orphaned, allegations of copyright violation not substantiated. WilyD 14:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JillsHeadshot-printable8x10.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moviebuff123 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 01:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Added to Jillian Murray. Keep as there's no reason to suspect copyvio and it's no longer orphaned. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 11:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  While I'm not one to be strict in NFCC#8, this is the logo of a community centre which isn't mentioned in the article.  Decorative is the right word. WilyD 13:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Communitycentrelogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PMK1 (notify | contribs).

• Image is decorative, not mentioned in the article containing it, does not enhance the quality of the article per WP:NFCC#8.

Name is too generic, delete and protect Fasach Nua (talk) 12:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not decorative. The section clearly talks about the Macedonians in Queanbeyan. The article clearly talks about the Macedonian community of Queanbeyan and that is the logo that they have chosen to use for themselves. I believe it enhances the quality of the article. PMK1 (talk) 12:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  A tougher call than the previous logo, but the article contains no discussion of KUD Razigrana Makedonka, Queanbeyan, something I had to research externally.  With one-half a sentence on KUD Razigrana Makedonka, this is really an "offhand mention", not explored in any depth whatsoever.  If the info on KUD Razigrana Makedonka, Queanbeyan was spun off into a seperate article, it'd be speedied by A7, or possibly an overeager A1.  WilyD 14:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RazigranaMakedonka.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PMK1 (notify | contribs).

• Image is decorative, not mentioned in the article containing it, does not enhance the quality of the article per WP:NFCC#8.

The image is not decorative. The section clearly talks about the Razigrana Makedonka KUD. It would serve of purpose to the users if the KUD's logo is displayed. It is clearly the Cultural and Folkloric wing of the Macedonians in Queanbeyan. Decorative is no good excuse.PMK1 (talk) 12:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Logo of organisation not discussed in article. Fails #8, as it is decorative. WilyD 14:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FOMKUDV.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PMK1 (notify | contribs).

• Image is decorative, not mentioned in the article containing it, does not enhance the quality of the article per WP:NFCC#8.

If you have noticed i have not yet finished the section about the Macedonians in Victoria. The FOMKUDV is an important organisation amongst the Macedonians in Victoria. Untill i finish that section or other users do being "decorative" is not a good enough excuse. PMK1 (talk) 12:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Kept.  Concerns appear to have been addressed. WilyD 17:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jack Sudgen.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jameshdl (notify | contribs).

• The contrast and brightness of the image is such that it is impossible to discern a face on a CRT monitor. Sceptre ^(talk) 12:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's easily fixed.Vexorg (talk) 01:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I vote this image isn't deleted. it's well within fair use. Let's not devalue wikipedia by being too trigger happy. Vexorg (talk) 01:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as image contrast has been fixed since deletion nomination. Guroadrunner (talk) 11:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Problematic licence. WilyD 14:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vogue Theater.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jimmy Kustes (notify | contribs).

• Only licensing is a deprecated PD template. Appears to be a possibly copyrighted image from Louisville.com, and there's no proof that the uploader is the copyright holder. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Accusation that it fails NFCC#8 is uncontested. WilyD 14:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hotaru Tomoe Mita Mao.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Masamage (notify | contribs).

• Image does not seem to meet WP:NFCC criteria #8, in that it doesn't add much to the reader's ability to understand the subject (Hotaru Tomoe) Vivio Testarossa^{Talk Who} 20:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Yeah. This doesn't really need a full-fledged IFD, though; it could have been brought up at the article's talk page first, and the editor-community there would be pretty easy to talk into getting rid of it. (We're trying to get on top of image stuff like this. Some of the other character articles have pictures of the musical actresses as well.) --Masamage ♫ 22:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  I didn't know about that, sorry. Could you please provide a link to the discussion. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 01:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  There's nothing yet. I just meant that there could have been; admittedly, I'm a fan of not going into big processes unless they're absolutely needed. Anyway, I'll point the other watchers of that article toward this page. I think deleting the image will probably be fine. --Masamage ♫ 04:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, nobody objects. WilyD 14:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jinniku_2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tetsuounit (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Kept lack of consensus to delete, no compelling policy arguments either way. WilyD 17:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jlojsl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xuchilbara (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Uploader took a break for a month; good chance of returning seeing as the user has been active for 2 years. User may decide to use this in userspace; there'd be nothing wrong with that. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 11:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, no objectors.

Image:Jman871.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jmccabe871 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Problematic licensing information.  If someone can confirm that the Nevada Shakespeare Company actually released this into the public domain, harrass me and I'll expedite it through OTRS. Cheers, WilyD 14:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jmheadshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Josiewarvelle (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It's a free photo Jeanmarie Simpson which may be used there in the future, uploader is likely to return, and there's nothing unencyclopedic about it. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 11:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• There is no evidence that the Nevada Shakespeare Company released this photo for use in the public domain. Probably would need an e-mail to OTRS to keep. -Nv8200p talk 02:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none dissenting. WilyD 17:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joanne_&_Taye_(7-21-07)_Oakland.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Skull_&_Bones (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, nobody objects. WilyD 16:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JocelynMEdwards.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FathomOz (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Kept.  Transfer to commons is, of course, possible. WilyD 14:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jockstrap_Rear_View_01.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TimmyTruck (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to commons; someone may find a use for it. Uploader also may return based on contribution history. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 11:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jock_rider.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Darius1991 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jocksniffing02.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TimmyTruck (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jockstrap_Views_01.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TimmyTruck (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, nobody objected. WilyD 16:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jodha_Aakbar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cheekyme_93 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, nobody objected. WilyD 16:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joe_&_Joey's_Daily_Life_(End_Of_The_World).png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sampo_Sheep (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, nobody cares. WilyD 16:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joe,_Joey,_Young_Joe,_Young_Joey.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sampo_Sheep (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, no objecters. WilyD 21:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joe_X.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schismberg (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Unused, no objecters. WilyD 21:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joe-Alliance.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schismberg (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, nobody appears to want it. WilyD 13:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joe-lemer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Whitmorewolveyr (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Kept.  Having an image of the obituary does not infringe the copyright upon the obituary anymore than quoting it in its entirity does, nor does repeating its text two, three or a Graham's number of times within a single document alter how minimal or not the usage is.  While one might question whether the shortness of the obituary is original research, this is not clearly elucidate in this discussion.  Realistically, while in use the most reasonable conclusion is that it's not, but either way no consensus exists here. WilyD 14:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Edward_Sheriff_Curtis_(1868-1952)_obit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Richard_Arthur_Norton_(1958-_) (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary fair use image. You don't need a scan of the small obituary to show that it was a small obituary. Garion96 (talk) 20:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Looks fine to me, the visual impact of a great man and a small biography needs a visual reference. The smallness of his obit is mentioned in each biography, and you don't see how truly small it is until its right in front of you. The visual impact had no effect on Garion96, but it did on me. The tiny obit was also featured at the Museum of Natural History in New York for the same reason. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Looks apropos, and should stay. The fair use rationale is fine and the obit lends considerable interest to the article...Modernist (talk) 11:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image fails criteria 1 (just state that it was a small obituary) and criteria 8 of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. Garion96 (talk) 15:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In your opinion, in my opinion it passes criteria 8, the image provides historical and valuable information and therefore stays..Please sign your edits in the future, thank you..Modernist (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Note that the full text of the obituary (which is also copyrighted as text) is additionally included in the article not once, but twice, leading to a threefold representation of this copyrighted item. If the "terseness" and shortness of the obituary is something particularly notable, source that observation, otherwise it's OR anyway, and even if you can source it you only need the literal text once, at most. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joe4643desat2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aemberygood (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 14:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JoeValenti.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Play16makr (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none opposed. WilyD 16:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joee_at_3_month.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bluejax258 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none opposed. WilyD 16:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joel_Parham.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jparha2 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, no objecters. WilyD 16:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joey_timson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Canaanchapman (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, none objecting. WilyD 21:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joeyrahimi1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Collegeprowler (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was

Deleted.  Orphaned, with none objecting. WilyD 13:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joflute.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gregory.lussier (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.