Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Alectura lathami - Centenary Lakes.jpg
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2011 at 10:37:34 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fc/Alectura_lathami_-_Centenary_Lakes.jpg/325px-Alectura_lathami_-_Centenary_Lakes.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/59/Alectura_lathami_-_Centenary_Lakes_crop.jpg/299px-Alectura_lathami_-_Centenary_Lakes_crop.jpg)
- Reason
- High quality image with good background separation.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Australian Brushturkey
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- JJ Harrison
- Support as nominator --JJ Harrison (talk) 10:37, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support interesting bird photo. Pinetalk 11:18, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support: High resolution and EV. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:37, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support Great image, like the colours of the background too. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 23:09, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- I would definitely crop a bit from the left to center the bird. Something like 2300px total width looked fine on my PC. And I suggest doing it now as FPs are so hard to edit after they are promoted. Materialscientist (talk) 10:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. I would also agree with a slightly tighter crop, given that the habitat in the background is not in focus anyway. --Elekhh (talk) 00:12, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support. I wouldn't object to a crop, but I don't think it's completely necessary. What an ugly creature. J Milburn (talk) 10:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support I prefer the original. Nice EV. SMasters (talk) 08:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support, pref Original --Muhammad(talk) 20:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support original -- Excellent quality and composition. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- Support either. Excellent, what a bird! TehGrauniad (talk) 19:28, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose The turkey's right leg borders have visible CA/jpg compression. Also its feathers in the back look like they were copy and pasted from another image (see the borders).-- Someone35 12:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- I think you might need to look up what both CA and jpeg compression look like. JJ Harrison (talk) 11:21, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- The tail looks like you pasted it from another image-- Someone35 14:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Do you believe the photo was doctored? It seems fairly clear that the border you are referring to is between the wing's edge and the body. Naturally, there will be a discontinuity in the coloration. Fallingmasonry (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't say that, I said how it looks like-- Someone35 07:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- Do you believe the photo was doctored? It seems fairly clear that the border you are referring to is between the wing's edge and the body. Naturally, there will be a discontinuity in the coloration. Fallingmasonry (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- The tail looks like you pasted it from another image-- Someone35 14:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Promoted File:Alectura lathami - Centenary Lakes.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 09:51, 21 September 2011 (UTC)