Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thue (programming language) (2nd nomination)

Thue (programming language)

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, non-notable, one of hundreds if not thousands of esolangs. wound theology ◈ 07:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 08:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Insufficient coverage online/in books to justify inclusion per WP:GNG. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Aesthetically, the language is simple. Theoretically, the language is founded in semi-Thue grammar, so it has a basis. Practically, it is a simple example of a rewriting system, like hello world, so it can be fed into a process. --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 13:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
None of these are good reasons to keep the page. There's no sources and it isn't notable. wound theology ◈ 19:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Most of the content of the article appears to be from the esolang wiki article, and that's the only non-primary mention of it I could find online (And even then, only through the external links section, a quick internet search returned no english-language results). Fails WP:GNG for me. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong)