Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H'Hen Nie

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Ben MacDui per CSD G5 (creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

H'Hen Nie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
H'Hen Nie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable model who fails WP:NMODEL. The article subject has yet to make the unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment required by NMODEL. SamHolt6 (talk) 02:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:51, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:51, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • SPI results -- the creator of the article has been confirmed to the socks listed in the SPI investigation: link. The other socks created very similar articles most of which has been deleted. This page should be deleted as well, per WP:DENY. No value in this under-sourced BLP, so better of deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.