Talk:List of most-visited websites

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: No consensus, 12 July 2023, see discussion. keep, 13 July 2018, see discussion.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Wikipedia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 13 September 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from List of most popular websites to List of most visited websites. The result of the discussion was moved.

Archives (Index)

1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

As of September 2024, the current #49 "most-visited website" as listed by similarweb.com (and therefore this article) is lazlogistics.ph, a website whose homepage is a plaintext-only 404. If I were to guess, this is a enterprise-facing domain owned by Lazada used for logistical purposes like tracking packages, but WHOIS returns nothing. Notably, Lazada.com itself is not on this list.

Similarweb has been the primary source for this entire article. The data it publishes is obfuscated, does not use units, and their methodology is unknown. We do know, however, that they try to keep websites that users do not directly navigate to off their list, like youtu.be, t.co, and googleapis.com. This is a failure of that, and it's embarrassing that Similarweb did not even check if the website 404s before putting it on their top 50 list for 3 months now. It is unclear to me whether this company should be considered a reputable source at all. 207.181.229.29 (talk) 01:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the entire links are suspicious Darcyr0y (talk) 05:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a live-streaming/social media platform. PracticalEarth (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:RedactedHumanoid, the commercialization of the Internet is truly remarkable, so I think we should highlight every NPO that can still make it under the first 50 websites, as long as there still is one. Best wishes,--Vergänglichkeit (talk) 12:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh what. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 16:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you may have pinged the wrong user. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 16:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are the correct user, see your edit from October 26th 04:22.--Vergänglichkeit (talk) 17:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. What about my edit did you wish to talk about? RedactedHumanoid (talk) 18:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wish for you to redo it, for the reason I gave above.--Vergänglichkeit (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm a bit confused here. I don't exactly understand the reason you gave above. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 18:32, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The "Company/NPO" column for the Wikipedia entry in this table should probably link to Wikimedia (the Foundation) instead of having a duplicate link to Wikipedia (the project). Harroyos (talk) 18:49, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Encoded  Talk 💬 20:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason this change was undone days later, I've corrected it now along with other page links. – OdinintheNorth (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]