Talk:Lakselv Airport/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Albacore (talk · contribs) 20:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-prose review (from here)
  • References 30, 45, 47, 54, 55 need a language parameter. Also, I am not familiar with Norwegian websites, what makes reference 30 reliable?
    • Parameters fixed. Ref 30 is a transcription of an article in the magazine of a trade union for aircraft mechanics. I would consider the magazine reliable and thus also the transcription. I can reformat the ref to cite the magazine instead if that is preferable. Arsenikk (talk) 15:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • It looks fine cited the way it is.
  • Where did you find the offline newspaper references?
    • They are available through Atext, a proprietary and closed resource available through my university which allows searchable access to printed newspapers in an archive. Thus I have actually read all the newspaper articles. Arsenikk (talk) 15:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Good to know.
  • File licensing checks out.

I will start the prose review when these are responded to. Albacore (talk) 20:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • Checks out.
History
  • Increased military funding was granted from 1937 and the following year, a triangular runway was built at Banak. Ambiguous, I would add a comma after "1937" to make clear the runway was built in 1938. To me, it currently sounds like funding was granted from 1937 and the following year.
  • In 1945, the air force operated a service from Bardufoss Air Station via Banak to Kirkenes Airport, Høybuktmoen, with correspondence to Oslo at Bardufoss. I don't understand what is meant by "service" here. Can you find a more specific term? I also don't understand what is meant by "correspondence".
Re-establishment
Operational history

The rest of the article checks out. I will pass when these are responded to. Albacore (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All seen to. Thank you for the review. Arsenikk (talk) 17:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]