Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list

This page is for requesting access to the redirect autopatrol pseudoright. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or NPP in general, please do so at the NPP discussion page.

The criteria for this pseudoright is an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects.

For a request to be considered successful it must have been open for at least 24 hours with the consensus of at least 3 editors who possess the new page reviewer permission (which includes all administrators). After two weeks, if a request does not have the individual consensus of 3 reviewers the request will be automatically closed. Alternatively an administrator may close a request as successful or unsuccessful at any time as part of standard individual administrative discretion for the granting of user rights.

Closed requests will be archived to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist/Old requests a few days after discussion ends.

Taivorist

Taivorist (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Lots of uncontroversial redirects for people with nicknames and redirects of longer names of a person. Roughly 100 redirects created in the past 40 days or so. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 22:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the template used for requesting the right as it appeared that the template is used to request the right for myself, however, I am nominating another editor. I am right in saying that nothing has changed and I am still able to nominate other editors? Or should I not have done this?

Willbb234 you're allowed to nominate other editors, but for some reason xtools doesn't seem to want to list redirects created by editors right now so I can't follow through on this just yet. I'll try to evaluate it later. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:07, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that, regardless of the xtools issue  Already done by Barkeep49, see the old requests link and/or the actual whitelist page. If you nominated them because you came across a redirect created by them in the queue and are confused, there's a known bug where redirects that have been edited by other editors or bots since their creation are not patrolled by the whitelist bot. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johnbod

• Johnbod (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi)

Self-nom, to save reviewers time. I've created 2756 redirects, of which 25, less than 1%, have been deleted. Johnbod (talk) 17:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC) Johnbod (talk) 17:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johnbod, You have autopatrolled rights. This only applies to editors who do not meet the requirement for getting autopatrol. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 17:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks - the page might make this clearer somehow. Johnbod (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done already autopatrolled --DannyS712 (talk) 18:00, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Highway 89

• Highway 89 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · redirects created · logs ^{(block • rights • moves)} · rfar · spi)

I don't qualify for autopatrolled status yet as I've only created 17 articles, but I do a fair amount of editing in WP:USRD which often involves creating multiple redirects, so I'm applying here to save the time of new page reviewers. Highway 89 (talk) 23:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Highway 89 (talk) 23:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, while I didn't see any issues in a cursory glance at your contributions, with only 65 redirects created I don't think that it's necessary to whitelist you at this time. I generally only add editors to the whitelist who have made over 100 redirects with no significant errors or issues, and it's only really saving work for NPP for editors who are creating hundreds to thousands of redirects. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:32, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]