Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AmandaNP (talk | contribs) at 04:04, 3 June 2019 (→‎User:VukAnd12: done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
Please review Wikipedia:Rollback before making a request. Applicants with fewer than 200 mainspace edits are unlikely to be granted this right. More importantly, applicants must have a measurable track record of counter-vandalism and no recent history of edit warring. The counter-vandalism training program is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.

User:InvalidOS

I have asked for the right a little while ago, and I was denied as I did not meet the edit requirement (I only had ~150 edits to mainspace at that point). I now meet that requirement, as I have 234 edits to mainspace. InvalidOS (talk) 16:47, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 16:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done for 2 weeks, and then we will review. You have basically reapplied with little additional experience (3 days), and haven't been doing any vandalism fighting since, so we'll review things in two weeks. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 02:56, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:StudiesWorld

I have done various vandalism-fighting over the years with STiki and Twinkle. I think that since my recent denial, I have shown in my recent efforts, that I remain capable. StudiesWorld (talk) 23:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 23:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for gaining the experience before reapplying. Sadly, there are issues with how you are identifying what is and is not vandalism, plus when you are reverting good faith edits, your not including an edit summary. Rollback is not for undoing good faith edits and my concern is that you would use it for that. I would recommend a trainer at WP:CVU to assist you in learning the ropes more.  Not done -- Amanda (aka DQ) 03:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:LPS and MLP Fan

Hello. I am LPS and MLP Fan. I am pretty experienced with editing Wikipedia, as I am an extended confirmed user with over 1000 edits. I have been on Wikipedia for 10 months, respectively. I would like to get the rollback feature. This would make reverting vandalism and other problematic edits easier. I promise that I would use rollback responsibly. I have waited 3 months for this. LPS and MLP Fan (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 19:53, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I thank you for taking the time to follow the previous advice. Normally, I don't grant rollback to users with under 100 edits, but I'm willing to consider a trail here. My concern is that you can not correctly identify vandalism yet ([3]). Also, a question, would you use rollback in any of these edits? ([4][5][6]) -- Amanda (aka DQ) 03:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Hello God

I believe I have gained experience in combating vandalism with the help of Twinkle, and would like access to the rollback tool to do this even faster. The Hello God (talk) 01:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MisterDiscovery -- Amanda (aka DQ) 03:31, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spyder212

I have been editing Wikipedia for a few years, initially as an IP during university and subsequently resumed using this account. Have been contributing mostly to articles related to science or medicine, which often involves a lot of undoing/revision and leaving notices/explanations/warnings on talk pages. I also enjoy fighting vandalism by reviewing recent changes from IPs and non-confirmed users. Have been reviewing pending changes as well recently. Using Twinkle is great, but Rollback would allow me to be more efficient in this role. Spyder212 (talk) 03:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC) Spyder212 (talk) 03:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nithin.danday

I applied a couple weeks ago, and was granted temp rollback rights because i had ~180 mainspace edits. This was because a large portion of my edits were on the User Talk Namespace, where I would post vandalism warnings. The temp rollback rights have expired so now I am requesting non-temporary rollback rights, now that I have > 200 edits in the Mainspace Namespace. I mostly use rollback rights for Huggle, as a tool for RC patrolling and counter vandalism. Thanks,
Nithin Danday! (talk) 04:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Glad to see you back, and everything looks good. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 03:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:VukAnd12

I have used Twinkle to revert vandalism, and I would like to get access to the Rollback tool to do this faster with Huggle. 👤VukAnd12 - 💬 - 📋 19:42, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:L1amw90

Hi, I'm unsure if I meet the requirements for rollback, as I'm not sure what "mainspace" is, however I do have over 4,000 edits.. thank you L1amw90 (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You do meet the mainspace (article space) requirement, but given your statement and lack of notifying users, I don't think you have the experience needed for rollback. I would recommend some training from WP:CVU.  Not done -- Amanda (aka DQ) 03:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:WikiAviator

I want to help find more unconstructive edits and help combat vandalized pages using HUGGLE. Note: This user has 278 mainspace edits. Edit Count WikiAviator (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&oldid=900055532"