Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Page semi-protected
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MusikAnimal (talk | contribs) at 17:25, 1 December 2016 (done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers for the granting guidelines. Applicants should show some evidence that they generally meet the guidelines outlined there, have a demonstrated need for the right, and that they have read and fully understood the tutorial at Wikipedia:New pages patrol.

User:Mr. Guye

Hello. I have been editing Wikipedia since 2012. I had done NPP prior to the changes, and since I have also been active with WP:AfC, I received a message saying that there is a backlog and help was needed. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm rather concerned by your heavy tag-bombing of some articles including Susan Yannaccone and Ralph W. Sallee without even notifying the authors. Please let me know when you have read the updated tutorial.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kudpung: Which updated tutorial? --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NPP. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:17, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Numbermaniac

Hello. I am requesting the New page reviewer right because I have done a fair amount of reviewing for AFC, and have previously patrolled articles. I am familiar with the guidelines surrounding page review, and would like to help to clear the New Pages Feed with this right. Thank you! -- numbermaniac (talk) 05:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Johanna

I've been on a semi-WikiBreak for a bit and didn't realize that this user permission was created. I've been on WP for roughly two years, and NPP and CSD/PROD have been some of my main maintenance work (see User:Johanna/CSD log). In my earlier days, I was very active at AFC as well. Thanks to any patrolling sysops for taking the time to review this request! Johanna(talk to me!) 19:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Johanna: I am seeing many overhasty nominations on the A7 criterion. Editors do not have a chance to put any claim of importance. I recommend at least a 30 minute delay before tagging with A1, A3, A7 or A9 to let the editor say what they wish to put down in the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Graeme Bartlett: Thanks for taking the time to reply. Based on the CSD criterion for A7 and Template:uw-hasty, I was under the impression that this consensus tended to apply more to A1 and A3 than anything else. In addition, the 10–15 minute guideline is what I tend to use as opposed to Of the potentially problematic speedy nominations (that I can access), there are only two A7s in the past year that may fit this pattern. One of them was tagged nine minutes after creation, and one of them was done after Wgolf put a serious tag on the article, which led me to (perhaps mistakenly) assume that I could use my best judgment as well. Both of these were eight months ago. For any other articles, I tend to apply A7 quickly only when nothing on a source search seems to be able to save the article, when it's an A7/G11 that's obviously a COI, and other similar issues. Hope that helps. Johanna(talk to me!) 15:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheGracefulSlick

I am an experienced editor in article creation with over 200 articles (no deletions) to my name. In addition, I am also somewhat active in Afd creation and voting, and have shown an understanding of notability guidelines as a result. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 05:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:NorthBySouthBaranof

I am a longtime, experienced editor with a number of created articles and DYKs and a thorough understanding of policies including notability and BLP, and have been occasionally active in page-reviewing when I get the itch :) NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kdaly100

Hi I had this right and am now getting back into it and plan to spend more time in my spare time patrolling. I used to be quite busy doing this and plan to be again. BustOut (talk) 19:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Xyzspaniel

I have been interested in maintenance tasks on Wikipedia since I became semi-retired this summer (as I’m never going to be a great content creator, except for when I see red links that I might know something about). I currently review the few articles with edits awaiting review that come my way per day, use the rollback rights if and when required, and classify maybe 30-40 edits per day on STiki - I am careful to notify editors either through this programme or Twinkle if I find more problem edits on the editor or IP’s history. I always try to err on the side of assuming good faith. I had started NPP around September this year and continued until the new rights came in and as such I am familiar with the Page Curation Tool, understand that it is not a race and to give the article time (except hoax, attack pages etc.,), don’t bite newcomers etc., and that many of the articles are going to be OK with a little TLC - maybe add a ref if I can, clean up with ReFill or add a cat. I had received auto notification to apply for NPP permission mid Nov but wanted to wait the month that admin Kudpung previously advised. I can confirm that I have carefully studied the new guidelines and would like to initially start on the large backlog from around July 2016, if permission is granted. XyzSpaniel Talk Page 22:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 22:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:SSTflyer

I have been entrusted with the Autopatrolled, AutoWikiBrowser, Page mover, Pending changes reviewer, and Rollbacker rights. I patrol new pages using Special:NewPages and Twinkle. Most of my CSD nominations are accurate. Thanks SSTflyer 11:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — MusikAnimal talk 17:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:GT-AWB

This is my alternative account, and since my main account has the "new page reviewer" permission, I would like the alternative account to have it as well. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 15:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has 66 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 15:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I don't really see why you'd need this on your alt AWB account, or rollback for that matter, but okay — MusikAnimal talk 17:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fly Up

I frequently work on New Page Patrol and Articles for Creation, and occasionally get involved in dispute resolution. I'd like to help with the backlog on reviewing changes as well. Fly Up (Talk) 10:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:CapitalSasha

I have reviewed new pages on and off for a few years and have started to get more into it. I haven't used the patrolled feature and I just read that it should be used, so I'd like to get more into that. CapitalSasha ~ talk 16:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC) CapitalSasha ~ talk 16:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer&oldid=752506887"