Talk:List of Japanese Academy Award winners and nominees
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Academy Awards which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 19 July 2024
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that List of Japanese Academy Award winners and nominees be renamed and moved to List of Japanese Emmy, Grammy, Academy, and Tony Award winners and nominees. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
List of Japanese Academy Award winners and nominees → List of Japanese Emmy, Grammy, Academy, and Tony Award winners and nominees – Article title change. GeniusTaker (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Support - No nom given, but it seems the article encompasses more than just Academy Awards. It would make sense to rename the title to reflect that article contents. MetropolitanIC (💬|📝) 21:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)- It looks like you merged content into this article here from List of Japanese Grammy Award winners and nominees without WP:ATTRIBUTION. Please refer to the policies at WP:MERGE about merging I linked on how to properly suggest and perform a merge of article.
- So, before we entertain this requested move, we should first establish with the other existing page, whether such a merge is preferred to begin with.
- I have reverted the unattributed merge into this article until either discussion has been held and completed.
- I'm requesting this move discussion be procedural close for now, while a merge discussion to begin with can be held. Or if we combine a discussion on the premise itself with this here, I'd likely oppose the proposed move on the basis of WP:PRECISE with keeping the two (or 4 with the expansion of the scope) staying separate. Raladic (talk) 21:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Raladic (talk) 21:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've retracted my support for the move, I agree that we should review the merge before discussing. Thanks for being vigilant. MetropolitanIC (💬|📝) 21:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)